transaction BBPCF01 versus BBPCF02

[Former Member]

Hello,

When a Vendor confirms a Purchase order via SRM 5.0 via transaction BBPCF01, the header data do not appear.

We need this data to be able to attach a document.

When the user himself confirms via the trx. BBCF02 the Purchase Order, the header data tab appears with the posibility to add document attachments.

What might we have done wrong? What is missing?

Thanks in advance for any replies.

Aart

[Former Member]

Thanks

[Former Member]

Hello Imthiaz,

Thanks for your reply. It gives me some hope we do not need to do a lot of Additional Programing to solve this issue.

We tried to find this "habilitation source code" in the html screens of the BBPCF01 Trx but we cannot find it.

Can you please be a more especific on where the "habilitation" is done in SRM.

Thanks for any additional info.

Aart

[imthiaz_ahmed]

Look at this service bbpcf01-->saplbbp_cf_2620.html. Search for Documents:

`if (ITM_TEXTS.label == "Documents")`
            <td class="subTab">|</td>
          `end`

          `if (ITM_TEXTS.disabled)`

Correspondingly, look for the Fun GRp BBP_CF and screen 2620.

Regards, IA

[imthiaz_ahmed]

Both the service has the source BBPCF01, check the corresponding screens ( HTML as well as GUI). There should a check made whether to enable or disable. Just take care of that and it will solve your problem.

Regards, IA

[Former Member]

Hi,

I think by standard the employee roles has Confirm Goods/Services (BBPCF02), purchaser role has Confirm goods/services centrally ( BBPCF03) and the vendor role has Enter Delivery/Service ( BBPCF01) which does not have facility to attach docs.

May be you need a custom development to do this attachment for attaching docs by vendor while he submits confirmation.

Best regards,

Sridhar.