on 07-15-2008 8:20 AM
Must I define abstract interfaces with different names for BPM?
When interface appeared several times with different values and usage.
Of course they are the same message type.
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
new question
Hi,
Check this
Regards
Seshagiri
Only abstract interfacess can interact with the BPM, so we should create the abstract interfacess but not different names you can use the same one if the message type is same.
Do I need mapping between RFC and its abstract synchronized interface?
Message mapping happens between Message types , Dont worry about the interface types at this moment.
Thanks,
Kiran
Hi ,
Can you be more specific ?
You need message mapping only when you need to change the source message type to target message type.
Regards,
Kishore
You can use the same abstract interface if the MT is same.
No need to define another
Mahdu
No, You can use same abstract message interface ( if message type is same ) to process multiple interfaces in BPM .
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.