MI 7.0 - Problem with synchronization after syncBo creation

[Former Member]

Hi All,

I'm using MI 7.0 SP9. I have a syncBo Z_TEST type 2-Way.

I define GET_LIST, GET_DETAIL and CREATE BAPIs.

I create a Z_TEST syncBo on the client (status NEW).

After a synchronization, the Z_TEST object is created in the backend,

but the local syncBo status is INCONSISTENT and I have a second syncBo representing the new object with CONSISTENT status.

Log extraction :

02.07.2008 17:25:36 Adding header(mobile ID=0000002213, synchronization key=0000000006) data=TOP0001000
 02.07.2008 17:25:36 Before BAPI wrapper call: Create
 02.07.2008 17:25:36 Z_TEST_CREATE has started for run number 0000179341 and runtime counter 8
 02.07.2008 17:25:37 Z_TEST_CREATE has finished for run number 0000179341 and runtime counter 8
 02.07.2008 17:25:37 Before BAPI wrapper call: GetDetail
 02.07.2008 17:25:37 Z_TEST_GETDETAIL has started for run number 0000179341 and runtime counter 9
 02.07.2008 17:25:37 Z_TEST_GETDETAIL has finished for run number 0000179341 and runtime counter 9
 02.07.2008 17:25:37 Updating replication DB for mobile ID 0000002213 (headers=0, items=0)
 02.07.2008 17:25:37 All updates for one TOP block were successful (seq. no.=129, TOP cntr.=0000000001)

I should have :

Updating replication DB for mobile ID 0000002213 (headers=1, items=0)

Why the system doesn't make the link between the created object in the backend and the local object ?

Any idea ?

[Former Member · Accepted solution]

Hi,

it is your CREATE handler in the backend that has the issue. It sends the data down to the device - have a look into the standard codings for BOs how they handle this - this is in that case the easiest way, cause everything else is a guess from this side. But at least: it is most likely the BADI coding on the backend - could be the mapping on the Middleware as well, but that is not that oftenthe issue.

Regards,

Oliver

[Former Member · Accepted solution]

Hi Olivier,

Thanks for your answer.

In fact, the problem was the GET_DETAIL. It didn't return the header of the syncBo.

Regards,

Mike.