on 07-02-2008 2:19 PM
Hi all,
we have a very slow processing on LSMW and IFS access. I believe it was slow all the time in the past. This LSMW transaction only converts some data, which are stored in a flat file in the IFS and stores it again into a flat file in the IFS. It is reading the data from IFS and writing again the data into the IFS.
IFS is not fast, I know. But do you have an similar experiences with such LOAD ?!
R/3 Enterprise 4.70 shows with transaction SM50 the following lon running job:
4 BGD 65988 waiting Yes
5 BGD 65989 waiting Yes
6 DIA 85421 running Yes 1 SAPLTHFB 100 USER1
7 DIA 65993 running Yes 11500 /1CADMC/SA 100 USER2
8 DIA 65994 waiting Yes
9 DIA 65995 waiting Yes
The WRKACTJOB Display shows:
This means for me the job is not doing so much with the database. Only 439 I/O's in 21 minutes. This is nothing. I have tried to give to this job Priority 19, but this is not the reason, the job is not going faster.
Work with Active Jobs
02.07.08 1
CPU %: 89,0 Elapsed time: 00:21:25 Active jobs: 895
Subsystem/Job Type Pool Pty CPU Int Rsp AuxIO CPU %
WP06 BCI 2 20 395,2 136 0,0
WP07 BCI 2 19 10274,0 439 12,7
WP08 BCI 2 20 1156,0 8 0,0
WP09 BCI 2 20 874,3 6 0,0
The WRKSYSSTS Display shows: This means for me, the is no memory lack.
Sys Pool Reserved Max ----DB----- --Non-DB--- Act- Wait- Act-
Pool Size M Size M Act Fault Pages Fault Pages Wait Inel Inel
1 5000,00 1448,43 +++++ 0,0 0,0 0,4 0,5 94,9 0,0 0,0
2 60340,00 44,65 3500 51,6 6335 113,4 364,1 7887 0,0 0,0
3 128,00 0,00 10 0,0 1,3 0,2 0,8 17,2 0,0 0,0
The WRKDSKSTS Display shows no problem in DASD.
I/O Request Read Write Read Write %
Rqs Size (K) Rqs Rqs (K) (K) Busy
11,5 12,4 3,0 8,4 13,2 12,1 2
13,2 10,2 1,5 11,6 7,0 10,6 1
10,6 8,8 3,5 7,0 8,2 9,2 2
13,8 12,4 4,2 9,5 10,1 13,5 2
8,3 71,3 7,5 0,8 78,4 7,4 5
17,7 123,6 17,5 0,2 125,2 4,0 9
27,0 83,1 25,7 1,3 87,1 4,3 10
26,9 95,0 25,6 1,3 99,6 5,8 9
16,9 115,4 16,2 0,7 120,3 4,0 8
37,3 116,7 37,0 0,2 117,3 18,0 13
21,4 94,0 20,3 1,0 98,6 6,2 7
12,7 72,8 11,5 1,1 77,6 26,8 6
13,5 85,1 12,3 1,1 92,0 12,8 5
Any idea, here ???
best regrads,
Carsten Schulz
Teamleader SAP-Basis, ebmpapst Mulfingen, Gemany
Hi Carsten,
you could try narrowing down reasons for the slow processing by using the DSPJOBPERF tool that is provided through SAP Note 1074177. You need to execute the command twice for the work process. The first time, all values get initialized with 0, then you wait a while (e.g. one minute) and execute the command again. From the output you can see where the time is spent - whether it is disk I/O, CPU time, or any kind of lock wait. You could also post the output here, so that we can discuss the next steps.
Kind regards,
Christian Bartels.
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
Hi together,
thanks for answering so fast.
The jobs read from the sysbas-IFS /usr/sap/a/b/ and writes to /usr/sap/SID/DVEBMGS00/work/ also in the sysbas-IFS.This IFS is not remote. Not through the QfileSrv.400 mechanism.
And yes, we have a HA solution. We have two IASP's on two different iSeries and are using XSM to mirror the data.
I have tried to increase the speed by switching off the XSM mirroring, but the speed does not increase. Sorry.
best regards,
Carsten Schulz
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
Hi Carsten,
I think the aux-ios in WRKACTJOB should include the IFS access as well and not just the database, so 400+ io's in 20 minutes is really very little if all the program does is read an IFS file and write another IFS file.... I wonder if you have any kind of HA solution active on this system? We have sometimes seen that the replication blocks IFS processing in such cases.
Regards,
Sally Power
Dev. Support for SAP on IBM i
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
Hi Carsten,
if you are talking on a remote IFS portion, the stuff is very slow - perhaps you could increase the TCP buffers ... but yes, the local IFS performance is a "known issue" - I would say, that this is always that slow ;-(((
Regards
Volker Gueldenpfennig, consolut international ag
http://www.consolut.de - http://www.4soi.de - http://www.easymarketplace.de
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
User | Count |
---|---|
86 | |
10 | |
10 | |
9 | |
7 | |
7 | |
6 | |
5 | |
4 | |
4 |
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.