cancel
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 

bpm

Former Member
0 Kudos

hi

my scenario is file to bpm to file1 and file2(1 to N bpm) and can any one tell me how many abstract interfaces i have to take and is there any change in occurence in message interface

Accepted Solutions (0)

Answers (6)

Answers (6)

Former Member
0 Kudos

Hi,

check your input file once and process.

Regards

samiullah_qureshi
Active Contributor
0 Kudos

Hi

You need three abstract interface to implement this scenario.

One for Receive file in BPM and other two to send data in file1 and file2.

any change in occurence in message interface

In message interface there is no concept of occurence.

Regards

Sami

Reward points if helpful.

GabrielSagaya
Active Contributor
0 Kudos

1 Outbound Asynchronous MI

2 Inbound Asynchronous MI (file1)

3 Inbound Asynchronous MI (file2)

4 Abstract asynchronous MI -file1

5 Abstract asynchronous MI -file2

Illustration of Multi-Mapping and Message Split using BPM in SAP Exchange Infrastructure

/people/sudharshan.aravamudan/blog/2005/12/01/illustration-of-multi-mapping-and-message-split-using-bpm-in-sap-exchange-infrastructure

Multi-Mapping without BPM - Yes, itu2019s possible

/people/jin.shin/blog/2006/02/07/multi-mapping-without-bpm--yes-it146s-possible

Walkthrough with BPM

/people/krishna.moorthyp/blog/2005/06/09/walkthrough-with-bpm

Former Member
0 Kudos

Hey,

in your case you need three abstract interfaces.

one for the recieve step(in bpm) i.e your source file.

two for send steps(in bpm) for your target files.

BPM design

Recieve->transformation->send->send

but in case if you do not want to use BPM you can go for enhanced interface determination.

refer to this link for enhances interface determination

/people/jin.shin/blog/2006/02/07/multi-mapping-without-bpm--yes-it146s-possible

in this you do not need to use a bpm.

you do not need to give any occurence for assigning two target structures in the interface mapping.

revert in case of any issue.

reward points if useful.

regards,

Milan

Edited by: Milan Thaker on May 28, 2008 11:47 AM

Edited by: Milan Thaker on May 28, 2008 11:51 AM

Edited by: Milan Thaker on May 28, 2008 11:52 AM

Former Member
0 Kudos

Hi,

Go for multi mapping and enhanced interface determination instead of BPM.

Check the blog for the same scenario.

/people/jin.shin/blog/2006/02/07/multi-mapping-without-bpm--yes-it146s-possible

Thanks,

Vijaya.

Former Member
0 Kudos

Hi,

Refer

Illustration of Multi-Mapping and Message Split using BPM in SAP Exchange Infrastructure

/people/sudharshan.aravamudan/blog/2005/12/01/illustration-of-multi-mapping-and-message-split-using-bpm-in-sap-exchange-infrastructure

File-XI-File BPM Split

Thanks

Swarup

Former Member
0 Kudos

hi

try this

/people/narendra.jain/blog/2005/12/30/various-multi-mappings-and-optimizing-their-implementation-in-integration-processes-bpm-in-xi

/people/krishna.moorthyp/blog/2005/06/09/walkthrough-with-bpm