cancel
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 

SRM Transaction Type of follow on documents for Bid Invitation BUS2200

Former Member
0 Kudos

Hallo,

we have the following scenario on SRM 5.0:

customizing:

we have defined 2 transaction types for BId Invitation.

spro/SRM/SRM server/cross application settings/Define Transaction type

Object type bus2200 - bid invitation

- transaction type 'bid1'

Transaction Types of Follow-On Documents: BUS2200 BID -> BUS2000113 WK

- transaction type 'bid2'

Transaction Types of Follow-On Documents: BUS2200 BID -> BUS2000113 MK

(where BUS2000113 is Purchase Contract)

It is not possible to create follow on documents from Vendor Bid.

Attributes for users are:

Transaction Type: Contracts CT_PROC_TY GCTR

Transaction Type: Contracts CT_PROC_TY PCTR

process:

we create a bid invitation, and from the received vendor bid we want to create a contract.

At time of contract creation the system propose contract type to be used from a dropdown box.

Issue:

The system always shows as proposed Contract Type: (it is driven by User Attributes)

GCTR

PCTR

We need to drive proposal of Contract Type by Bid Invitation type as set up in customizing:

type bid1 -> WK

type bid2 -> MK

Does anybody know how to solve this issue. Where are we going wrong?

Any help welcome.

Regards,

marco

Edited by: Marco Covino on May 8, 2008 6:19 PM

Accepted Solutions (0)

Answers (1)

Answers (1)

imthiaz_ahmed
Active Contributor
0 Kudos

You are doing wrong at the users attributes definition.

Attributes for users are:

Transaction Type: Contracts CT_PROC_TY GCTR

Transaction Type: Contracts CT_PROC_TY PCTR

It should be :

Attributes for users are:

Transaction Type: Contracts CT_PROC_TY WK

Transaction Type: Contracts CT_PROC_TY MK

Regards, IA

Former Member
0 Kudos

Hallo,

thank you for your reply.

What you are saying would only enforce the following on the dropdown list

WK

MK.

Our requirement is more specific.

After the vendor bid has been accepted, follow on document logic should be:

WK for transaction type BID1

MK for transaction type BID2

Would that be possible?

Regards,

marco

Edited by: Marco Covino on May 9, 2008 10:21 AM

Former Member
0 Kudos

working on the same issue.

Try one thing.

Don't specify any contract type in CT_PROC_TY.

But correctly specify your desired contract doc type(trans type) (e.g. MK & WK) under

SRM IMG ->Supplier Relationship Management->SRM Server->Cross-Application Basic Settings->Define Transaction Types->BUS2000113->Transaction Types->

(you may copy the std type PCTR)

assign the correct internal no range which should be same as the external no range for MK & WK in ECC.

Once you are ready with this and the bidding cycle is completed (for RFCR:Contract Negotiation)

all contarct trans types defined in above step will appear in accepted bid->Transaction Type for Contract to choose.

This will give freedom to purchaser to choose the follow-on contract trans type/ doc type

BR

Dinesh