on 03-13-2008 2:12 PM
When we write off outstanding checks, we do not wish to reverse the original payment document. Therefore, we used transaction FCH9 to void the checks. We created a new Void Reason, which identifies the void as part of the periodic writeoff of uncashed checks.
The positive pay file which we send to the bank lists these checks as issued, rather than voided. I have looked in the check register, and the void reason code and void date are correct.
Can anybody tell me why the checks would be marked as issued? Is there a configuration which we must set to define whether a void reason results in a voided check vs. an issued/reissued check?
Thank you.
Aoife
When we write off outstanding checks, we do not wish to reverse the original payment document. Therefore, we used transaction FCH9 to void the checks. We created a new Void Reason, which identifies the void as part of the periodic writeoff of uncashed checks.
The positive pay file which we send to the bank lists these checks as issued, rather than voided. I have looked in the check register, and the void reason code and void date are correct.
Can anybody tell me why the checks would be marked as issued? Is there a configuration which we must set to define whether a void reason results in a voided check vs. an issued/reissued check?
Thank you.
Aoife
Update:
The answer appears to be that our AP area requested a Z transaction based on standard transaction FCHX. The Z transaction had void reason codes hard-coded. Therefore, no SAP error. Internal error only.
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
User | Count |
---|---|
99 | |
11 | |
11 | |
6 | |
6 | |
4 | |
4 | |
3 | |
3 | |
3 |
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.