on 02-20-2008 2:46 AM
SMQR...QIN Scheduler..Should it always be called Queue_Scheduler or can we use Parallel_Generator also? I guess I'm trying to understand the difference between Queue_Scheduler and the Parallel_Generator. Any help is greatly appriciated.
So essentially you go to RZ12 and define any RFC group and come back under SMQR and put the same group name.
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
So the Queue_Scheduler has to be called Queue_Scheduler or can it be called anything??? Is there any dependency on the name?
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
QinSchedular has maily concentreating on inbound queues:
QIN Scheduler has the task of activating as many
inbound queues (not outbound queues) as possible using the current system resources. So that qRFC applications can
still process their queues themselves, the QIN Scheduler will only start queues that are already registered. Moreover, the
QIN Scheduler can also check the runtime of a queue at the end of a LUW execution in order to delay another execution
of the LUWs of this queue if necessary, so that other queues can also be edited.
Parallel genereator: Kindly let me know did u find this word in XI ?
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
In XI u have to use the QIN Scheduler for scheduling the LUWs. I think parallel_generators are linked with the Process chains of BI and unrelated to XI.
Regards,
Prateek
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
User | Count |
---|---|
83 | |
10 | |
10 | |
9 | |
7 | |
6 | |
5 | |
5 | |
4 | |
3 |
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.