on 01-21-2008 5:18 AM
Hi SRMgurus,
We have a PDP scenario where a channel R/3 has the RFCUSER maintained and the link is established with the ECC6.0.
When we try to send the PR to SRM the message shows the the PR is transferred but gives an error in the SLG1 as
"No valid requester found for user 0013
Message no. BBP_BD002"
The SMQ1 status is ANORETRY
TYPE : A
ID : BBP_EXTREQ
NUMBER : 013
MESSAGE : Ext. requirement cannot be created, see application log.
I followed the SDN messge
and added the stal purchaser( prof. purchaser) role in the front end.
The status doesnt change yet. Any clues??
Early help is highly appreciated.
Best regards,
Sridhar.
Hi Sridhar,
Check whether the RFC user assigned to channel is the same as the SM59 user connected with the backend.
Using SM59 transaction, by double clicking on the backend logical system under ABAP Connections check for the link user between the two systems under the Logon & Security tab.
Also check whether the channel ID is maintained under the Responsibility tab of the concerned P.Group.
Please let us know after checking these settings.
Award points for helpful answers.
Rgds,
Teja
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
Hi Sridhar,
We are also facing same concern.Can you please guide us how you resolve the concern.
We are having SRM5.0 system & backend system is R3 4.6b
Regards,
Avinash Pansare
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
Hi Avinash,
This problem comes when RFC is disturbed by changing the backend or the system is upgraded from one version to another version or the patch level is upgraded for any of the systems.(frontend and backend)
I did exactly the steps described by Teja in this thread.
Pl. check the RFC user from the SRM to R/3 and from R/3 to SRM and do Authorization test for the same.
Both the usersids should be same and identical.
Also in the organization structure of SRM this userid should be there as mentioned by Teja.
Best regards,
Sridhar.
Hi,
Thanks for all your comments and there was a user conflict between the SRM and the R/3 systems which was solved now.
Thanks a lot.
Best regards,
Sridhar.
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
Hello ,
Check also that the rfc user used in the connection from R3 to SRM is assigned in the SRM org. structure.
Rgds,
Pierre
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.