on 01-18-2008 2:00 AM
Is there any technical reason why there are 4 sapdata directories for SAP systems?
Why not just use a sapdataALL directory?
Cheers
Philip,
The reason why you have multiple sapdata directories is for performance issue. For a productive system, the more you spread your data on multiple volumes, the less you will have contentions. Also, you may want to isolate some tables on specific physical disks.
An other reason to have multiple sapdata is with SAN systems, in order to expand your capacity, it is better to create new volume groups than expanding the size of the existing volume groups.
Best regards.
Frank Markarian
SAP America
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
I think the reason behind that is historical.
In the "early days" those directories were spread over separate disks. I have seen much more directories (up to 75), depending on the system size.
Markus
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
Hi,
I agree with Markus, besides that filesystem size limits where certainly a reason to have multiple sapdata dirs in the past. We have now only a single /oracle/SID/sapdata1 in most systems and only add sapdata2, when we get more disks (and a new volume group is needed).
Sometimes it is a bit troublesome through installations, because i am always having trouble with the sapinst and his directory mapping. But creating sapdataX -> sapdata1 links always works as a workaround
Regards, Michael
User | Count |
---|---|
87 | |
10 | |
10 | |
9 | |
7 | |
6 | |
6 | |
5 | |
4 | |
3 |
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.