on 12-19-2007 12:51 PM
Generally what naming conventions are used in real time to define design and configuration objects name?
It really does depend on the project. Each project has its own defined standards but some examples are below.
Datatype: DT_
Message Type: MT_
Message Interface: MI_<Async/Sync>_<Direction>_
Message Mapping: MM_<SourceMessage>_<TargetMessage>
Message Interface: IM_<SourceMessage>_<TargetMessage>
Communication Channels: CC_<AdapterType>_<Send/Recv>_
Integration Process: IP
These are just a few and should give you some idea... but the main thing is to make sure they are always meaningful and easily distinguishable.
But as I said each project has its own flavour
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
Naming conventions
Namespace https:
<your Interface ID>:<business name>
ex: https:
SCP156:inventorydata
For Configuration
CS_SCP156_inventory_data
actually it depends on the Bunsiness name for the interface or how you fix your naming conventios it might be depending on your business process wht you follow to idetify the interfacess...
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
User | Count |
---|---|
84 | |
10 | |
10 | |
10 | |
7 | |
6 | |
6 | |
5 | |
4 | |
4 |
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.