on 12-05-2007 12:16 PM
Hi,
I am working on scenario where I will be getting Header,Trailer and in between plant records.
I will be picking file and need to create a new file for each plant.
Do we require BPM for this? Can it be achieved in Message mapping only?
If so how?
Would appreciate your help.
Regards,
Chandra
Chandra,
Are u getting Header, Trailer, Plant records as different files from the source or in single file itself? If you are getting from different source then you need BPM. If you are getting single file and need to generate multiple output file then no need for BPM.
To be more simple N:1 or N:M then you need BPM.
1:M then no need for BPM.
Everything you have to do in the mapping part.
raj.
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
Hi Chandra.
You can do it using the 1:N mapping. It is possible even without using BPM.
Check this blog for a clear understanding.
/people/jin.shin/blog/2006/02/07/multi-mapping-without-bpm--yes-it146s-possible
Hope it helps you.
Regards,
Hari.
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
Hi Chandra,
<b>NO, you DO NOT need BPM</b> (if the number of plants is fix)
First make a Messae-mapping with the conditions for the first-plant. Then copy it for the ohter plants. Make the same for the interface-mappings.
Now in Integration Directory make receiver determinations for each plant, also interface deteminations with interface mappings.
Regards Mario
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
Yes you require BPM for this.
To split messages you require BPM.
In message mapping try copying the structure multiple time and then map it depending upon ur requirement and condition. this is 1 : n BPM transformation
Vishal
Reward points for useful help
Message was edited by:
vishal kharat
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
hi,
Also you can check this blog .. seems good without BPM..
/people/jin.shin/blog/2006/02/07/multi-mapping-without-bpm--yes-it146s-possible
regards
Aashish Sinha
PS : Reward points if helpful
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
<i>Do we require BPM for this? Can it be achieved in Message mapping only?
</i>
yes we require BPM for 1:n mapping
it can be achieved in message mapping.
<i>If so how?</i>
Goto message mapping> Target message structure> Message Tab--> add n messages
Map single source structure to n target structure....
Ans test it in test tab.....
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
Hi Chandra,
Ya u do require BPM for this. You can split your messages only using ccBPM. In message mapping try copying the structure multiple time and then map it depending upon ur requirement and condition. this is 1 : n ccBPM transformation.
Hope this will help you.
Regards
Aashish SInha
PS : reward points if helpful
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
User | Count |
---|---|
84 | |
10 | |
10 | |
10 | |
7 | |
6 | |
6 | |
5 | |
4 | |
4 |
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.