on 11-29-2007 9:40 AM
HI All,
Which Interface mappings are possible?
1.Abstract Async --> Abstract Sync
2.Abstract Sync --> Abstract Async
Thanks
Praveen
hi praveen,
1) asynch -- synch mapping isnt possible and will lead to error coz u will be able to map one of the two msgs only (request or response)
2) synch -- synch mapping is possible
[reward if helpful]
regards,
latika.
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
There can be a Asynchonous Communication and Synchronous Communication.
Now if you are thinking If I pass one Abstract_Asych interface (source) and Abstract_Synch interface (target)in the Interface Mapping then it work or not??
So Answer is NO.
Thanks
Farooq.
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
Hi
I think mapping between Asyn and Sync interfaces are not possible
yuga
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
<i>1.Abstract Async --> Abstract Sync
2.Abstract Sync --> Abstract Async</i>
>>>
both are not possible.
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
Configuring both is possibl. But u can provide only one message mapping in both the cases. So the 2nd interface of the abstract sync interface wont be of any use. This could lead to error at runtime. But compile time its ok.
Regards,
Prateek
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
can u ask ur question clearly
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
User | Count |
---|---|
76 | |
9 | |
8 | |
7 | |
6 | |
5 | |
5 | |
5 | |
5 | |
5 |
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.