on 11-28-2007 11:28 AM
I want to have Mappings(ABAP,JAVA,XSLT and Graphical) compared based on their Performance and Application level parameters(Execution time,complexity etc).
C this
/people/udo.martens/blog/2006/08/23/comparing-performance-of-mapping-programs
Regards,
Prateek
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
Hi Rupesh,
Regarding different Mapping.............as u know we have 4 type of mappings in that..Most of the senarios we use Graphical Mapping only.
Graphical Mapping is simple, We have standard funtions in graphical,we can write custom UDF in it............so in Projects mostly they prefer and we do Graphcal Mapping only..........and is performances is batter then other.
So Comparing the Performance in all this 4 mapping.
1)Graphical comes the best one
2)Java Mapping
3)XSLT mapping
4)ABAP Mapping.
ABAP Mapping i have never seen some one using this mapping...........its very rare mapping to be used.
Regards,
Phani
Rewardpoints if Helpful
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
Hi Rupesh,
Graphical mapping is the best one but still you can not use it as default coz if there is a need of ABAP mapping then you have to go for ABAP mapping.
Performance is totaly dependent upon the scenario/requirement which you are going to use because based on your scenario/requirement you will choose what mapping needs to be implemented rather then first looking the performance of mappings and then deciding the mapping.
For example, if there is a need of JAVA mapping in your scenarion then you will go for JAVA mapping instead of Graphical mapping coz that will be easier.
Regards,
Sarvesh
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
Hi Rupesh
here is the description of all 4 kinds of mapping we are using in XI, based on their performance and aaplication uses
1) Message mapping
- Graphical Design and test environment
- Queue based model allows handelling of very large documents
- Extensible via Java user defined functions
2) XSLT
- Open standard
- Portable
- extensible via java user defined functions
- Memory overhead for very large documents
3) JAVA
- flexibility of java programming language
- java mapping program is responsible for parsing/rendering XML
4) ABAP
-Leverage existing ABAP base
- ABAP mapping program is responsible for parsing/rendering XML
hope it may clarify you the mappings
For more details on Mapping you can follow TBIT
link are as follow
TBIT40:
https://websmp109.sap-ag.de/~form/ehandler?_APP=00200682500000001337&_EVENT=DISPLAY&COURSE=TBIT40
TBIT41:
thanks
sandeep sharma
PS: if helpful plz reward points
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
User | Count |
---|---|
84 | |
25 | |
12 | |
9 | |
6 | |
6 | |
5 | |
5 | |
4 | |
4 |
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.