cancel
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 

Server proxy error

Former Member
0 Kudos

I am getting the 'FORBIDDEN' errors while executing server proxy

SAP:AdditionalText>Service is not active</SAP:AdditionalText>

<SAP:ApplicationFaultMessage namespace="" />

<SAP:Stack>HTTP response contains status code 403 with the description Forbidden XML element Envelope missing in SOAP message header (SAP XI Extension)</SAP:Stack>

<SAP:Retry>M</SAP:Retry>

My service user is assigned the role SAP_XI_IS_SERV_USER and I have configured the /sap/xi/engine?type=entry in the communication channel (640).

Accepted Solutions (1)

Accepted Solutions (1)

Former Member
0 Kudos

check the authentication type in XI adapter it should be <b>'Use logon data for non-SAP system</b>' and user should be xiappluser.

Former Member
0 Kudos

Arpit, Receiver system is R/3 only!! And setting it to XI 2.0 doesn't help either

Former Member
0 Kudos

check if the XIISUSER user has the following roles:

SAP_XI_IS_SERV_USER

SAP_XI_IS_SERV_USER_MAIN

Former Member
0 Kudos

The service user has both the roles assigned in the integration server and SAP_XI_IS_SERV_USER role assigned in R/3 system.

Former Member
0 Kudos

>>should I use a business system for ABAP proxy

Ya u shd use Buisness System For ABAP PRoxy.In Buisness System give the reciever R/3.

Go thru this blog for ABAP Server proxy

/people/siva.maranani/blog/2005/04/03/abap-server-proxies

Hope it helps and u will give the needful points.

Former Member
0 Kudos

Arpit I am using Business system for receiver R/3 (only for sender, I am using business service).. Thanks anyway for your inputs

Does the 'SAP:Additional text' "service is not active" imply that I need to activate the Service in SICF on receiver system(R/3 side)? (services are active on the integration server)

Former Member
0 Kudos

Hi SSG,

You have to actvate your services in Transaction code SICF.

Activate manually services in SICF in R/3 also.

default_host-SAP-XI-Engine.

Thanx.

Rekha

Answers (1)

Answers (1)

Former Member
0 Kudos

Have you tried putting it on XI 2.0 instead of 3.0...

regards