Hi,
Most of my flows are <b>"IDoc -> file" or "file -> Idoc"</b>, and I need to manage several transcodification tables for different countries (I prefer a DDIC table to FixValue or Value mapping) and with an amount of Business systems (more than 300).
Before this week, I used <b>Graphical mapping</b>... but with some difficults to manage correctly several levels of IDoc segments. Graphical mapping is easy to use when there are one or two "0...unbound" segments but no more. And you cannot have an easy access to a DDIC (need to use an RFC in BPM).
Since I'm trying to use <b>abap mapping</b>... but with some difficults to manage correctly the creation of an "0..unbound" messages, in order to distribute them to one or several receivers. Abap mapping is esay to use when there is only one receiver (no management before a block "Multiline to single line"; and it is interresting for requests on DDIC tables (very easy). But it seems there is some differences between a testing with tcode "sxi_mapping_test" (thus in foreground ==> easy to debug) and with the execution of the scenario (thus in background ==> difficult to debug).
I don't know yet the XSLT mapping and the Java mapping (a complete one, not a java function inside graph mapping).
Inside XI 3.0, for such flows, is there a <b>mapping tool</b> which is better than the other with IDocs?
Regards.
Mickael.
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.