on 11-21-2007 11:13 AM
Hi Everyone,
We have recently upgrade SAP from 4.6C to ECC 6.0, we are currently experiencing an issue with transferring consignment stock to our own stock, when using 4.6C we would use MB1C movement type 911.
Since the upgrade an <u>error</u> is appearing <b>M395 Different prices on issuing and receiving side</b>. All info records are the same price, but still receive the error message.
There is a note explaining the error 610896, but unfortunately the note is only relevant upto 4.7, so this must be implemented due to our upgrade step.
Does anyone know of a method to change this error to a warning, or is 911 no longer relevant in ECC6.0?
Kind Regards
Mark.
Hi
U can act according to SAP note u have told
as u said its relivent to 4.7
i have had the same issue for diffrent problem sap have told to me to do the changes as per the sap note though sap note was not relivent to ECC6
Hope this will help u
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
Did you maintain the equal prices for the same periods?
Info record has time depended conditions. Make sure the price is valid and equal for the date you use for the movement.
You cannot change the error message to warning. It is hardcoded to not allow valuation differences. The OSS note explains that.
First clarify what you do. Movement type 911 is not a standard movement type, it is a customized one.
You talk about removing indicator, you say that you want transfer consignment stock in own stock. But the OSS note talks about moving consignment stock from one plant to another.
The where-used list for the message M7395 just points to MM07MFU0_UMLAGERMAT_PRUEFEN
And the code responsible for the error is:
if p_netwr_before <> vm07m-netwr. "EP 2.0 konsi
receiver's price is different to sender's price
message e395. "EP 2.0 konsi
endif. "EP 2.0 konsi
Debug at this code and you may be able to see the 2 prices. Maybe then you can identify their origin.
Hi
You can change this into warning using T.code OMCQ, if it is available in ECC6.0
Thanks & Regards
Kishore
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
User | Count |
---|---|
98 | |
11 | |
11 | |
6 | |
6 | |
4 | |
4 | |
3 | |
3 | |
3 |
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.