on 11-19-2007 11:34 AM
Hello,
I have a scenario where a sender SAP system sends an IDoc via an Interface Mapping to an Integration Process.
This worked perfectly fine on our development environment, but after transporting the scenario to our quality systems I got the following acknowledgement error:
Unable to convert the sender service <i>name of integration process</i> to an ALE logical system.
What could be the reason for this? We have a logical system on the sender SAP system set up for the XI system itself but not for the Integration Process.
We also use SYSTAT IDocs and there we set the the logical sender system name to the logical system for SAP XI and not for the integration process.
Is this also necessary for acknowledgements? Where could this be done. Strange thing is that it works perfectly fine on our development environment.
Hi Florian,
(has nothing to do with SLD)
Go at IB directory to the adapter specific identifiers of the process and put there any logical system name. If you look to now the WE02 at ERP you will see a red icon for ALEAUD01 idoc as you dont have maintained that system (SALE, WE20). If you dont need the system acknowledgement just surpress it with report IDX_NOALE.
Regards,
Udo
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
Hello,
yes, I have checked the adapter specific identifiers in the integration process. Those values are empty both on D and Q-environments as we set the sender systems to the logical system pointing to SAP XI in the Receiver Agreements. So I guess the only feasable way to go is to disable the Acknowledgements in in the ABAP Report you specified.
This sounds SLD related... WOrking in one system and not another...
Have you checked the Logical system names for the Business Systems?
We had to debug the failed entry from the Queue within SMq1.
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
User | Count |
---|---|
85 | |
10 | |
9 | |
9 | |
6 | |
6 | |
6 | |
5 | |
3 | |
3 |
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.