on 11-15-2007 10:16 AM
Hi
I know that using Adaptive RFC, the best practice is to use the Tables section of the function rather than the import/export.
However, in ECC6.0, when creating entries in the Tables section of the FM it tells me that this section is obsolete.
Should I start to use the export/import parameters instead?
Cheers
Ian
Hello Ian,
May be the code snippet will help understanding your problem more clearly.
Ashu
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
Hi Ashu
Thanks for the reply but there is no code snippet. It is a 'best practice' question.
The document <a href="https://www.sdn.sap.comhttp://www.sdn.sap.comhttp://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/sdn/go/portal/prtroot/docs/library/uuid/11c3b051-0401-0010-fe9a-9eabd9c216de">Effective Web Dynpro - Adaptive RFC</a> details that table values should not be passed in the exporting/importing parameters of the R/3 RFC enabled function module. THey should always be added to the Tables section.
However, in ECC6.0, when adding entries into the Tables section of an R/3 function module, it says that this practice is obsolete.
Therefore, what is the current best practice for Adaptive RFC??
Cheers
Ian
User | Count |
---|---|
85 | |
10 | |
10 | |
9 | |
7 | |
7 | |
6 | |
5 | |
4 | |
4 |
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.