on 11-11-2007 9:46 AM
OK, hope someone can help me. We are using a Hierarchy, maintained in R/3 and extracted in BI - Ideal situation
No the funny part of this hierarchy is that in BEx there are a number of nodes that is is not displaying.
The short of the story is that we are going only 5 levels deep so this should not be a problem...correct.
Ont thing i need to mention is the following: the hierarchy is a financial item hierarchy. Another thing, on the technical name of the Hierarchy in R/3 for the 2 specific nodes that are not displaying, the technical name end with a A and the one related to it with a B.
My questions are as follows:
1. Is it possible that the technical Naming convention in R/3 could cause this problem?
2. What are the reasons why some of the nodes will not display BEx?
3. Could the amount of sub nodes that are underneath a node have an impact on the whole hierarchy not displaying?
Just to clarify...the Hierarchy in BI looks exactly like in R/3 so the Master data load did not give any errors or warnings in any way.
I would really appreciate your assistance in this regard and as always...point will be assigned.
Cas
Refer links for information on hierarchies in BEx...
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw04/helpdata/en/0e/fd4e3c97f6bb3ee10000000a114084/frameset.htm
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw04/helpdata/en/1a/25213c9cffa027e10000000a11402f/frameset.htm
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
Thank you for the comments. The problem was solved by using a different version of the Hierarchy. Points assigned.
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
have you take a look at
RSA1 / infoObject / <i>your Hierarchy characteristic</i> / <i>your Hierarchy </i>
Double click Display your Hierarchy . Check in the right panel by expand the tree. is this Hierarchy full filled which what you need?
Regards,
Chuong Hoang
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
It doesnot matter if the hierarchy is just 5 levels deep.
<i>1. Is it possible that the technical Naming convention in R/3 could cause this problem?</i>
I dont think so naming convention would not let the two nodes to display in BEx as hierarchy looks similar in BI/RSH1 to the one in R/3.
<i>2. What are the reasons why some of the nodes will not display BEx?</i>
May be there is no transaction data for none of the Accounts under that node and the node is not displayed in the report.
<i>3. Could the amount of sub nodes that are underneath a node have an impact on the whole hierarchy not displaying?</i>
As said, there may be no amounts at all no transaction data in the underlying Infoprovider.
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
User | Count |
---|---|
84 | |
25 | |
12 | |
9 | |
6 | |
6 | |
5 | |
5 | |
4 | |
4 |
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.