MIGO DUMP

[Former Member]

Hi all

While doing MIGO for Delivery I am geeting a run time error, I am giving the details of the error below.

Runtime Errors MESSAGE_TYPE_X

Date and Time 05.11.2007 06:05:17

Short dump has not been completely stored (too big)

ShortText

The current application triggered a termination with a short dump.

What happened?

The current application program detected a situation which really

should not occur. Therefore, a termination with a short dump was

triggered on purpose by the key word MESSAGE (type X).

Error analysis

Short text of error message:

Could not determine recipients for message type INVCON

Technical information about the message:

Diagnosis

An IDoc of message type INVCON was passed to the ALE layer, but the

three receiver fields in the header record were not filled. In this

case the ALE layer tries to determine the receivers from the

entries in the distribution model. There are no entries available

in the distribution model for the above message type.

Procedure

Define the receivers in your distribution model for this message

type or deactivate distribution for these message types.

Message classe...... "B1"

Number.............. 003

Variable 1.......... "INVCON"

Variable 2.......... " "

Variable 3.......... " "

Variable 4.......... " "

Variable 3.......... " "

Variable 4.......... " "

gger Location of Runtime Error

Program SAPLMBWL

Include LMBWLU21

Row 53

Module type (FUNCTION)

Module Name MB_POST_GOODS_MOVEMENT

rce Code Extract

e SourceCde

23 ENDIF.

24 xcommit = x. "Performance

25 IF NOT xblnr_sd IS INITIAL.

26 xmkpf-xblnr = xblnr_sd.

27 MODIFY xmkpf INDEX 1.

28 * when a goods movement for an inbound or outbound delivery is posted

29 * directly from VL31N/ VL01N, XBLNR is not yet known when we call

30 * CKMV_AC_DOCUMENT_CREATE, but the number is supposed to be stored in

31 * BKPF as well. There is no other way to forward XBLNR to FI as not

32 * every document is posted by MB_CREATE -> a new function module in

33 * MBWL for transferring the information, called by FI, meant to load

34 * the complete function group for all MBxx postings when this isn't

35 * required (Performance). Would be the better way to transport the

36 * information after switching off MBxx in later release.

37 * corresponding IMPORT ... FROM MEMORY ... can be found in

38 * AC_DOCUMENT_POST (FORM FI_DOCUMENT_PREPARE (LFACIF5D))

39 l_mem_id = 'MKPF-XBLNR'. " 641365

40 EXPORT xblnr = xblnr_sd TO MEMORY ID l_mem_id. " 641365

41 ENDIF.

42 IF xmkpf-xabln IS INITIAL. "note 434093

43 CALL FUNCTION 'MB_XAB_NUMBER_GET'. "note 434093

44 ENDIF. "note 434093

45 CALL FUNCTION 'MB_CREATE_MATERIAL_DOCUMENT_UT'

46 EXCEPTIONS error_message = 4.

47 * As soon as we have started to put things into UPDATE TASK, we must

48 * ensure that errors definitely terminate the transaction.

49 * MESSAGE A is not sufficient because it can be catched from

50 * external callers which COMMIT WORK afterwards, resulting in

51 * incomplete updates. Read note 385830 for the full story.

52 IF NOT sy-subrc IS INITIAL.

>>> MESSAGE ID sy-msgid TYPE x NUMBER sy-msgno WITH "385830

54 sy-msgv1 sy-msgv2 sy-msgv3 sy-msgv4.

55 * MESSAGE A263.

56 ENDIF.

The programme was terminated in line 53 where there was a note 385830, I am trying to apply note 556000, is this the right approach.

Please guide me.

Suresh

[Former Member]

apply the new note and check again...

as it is standard code you can change it through note application or patch application..

search for the MIRO dump note or correction for note 385830

[Former Member]

Hi Sharyu

Thanks for the reply. I will do that and let u know.

suresh

[Former Member]

Hi Suresh,

Yes you can apply that note. Also you need to apply note 561872. What is your SAP version?

Regards,

Atish

[Former Member]

Hi Atish,

thanks for immediate reply, I am in ecc 6.0, yes i have to apply the note along with 556000. what confuses me here is theshort text of the error message " could not determine recipients of error mesage type INVCON". Is there any thing I have to do realted to this.

Suresh

[Former Member]

Hi Suresh,

I don't think you need to implement this note as you are on ECC6.0. This is for upto SAP 4.7.

Search OSS you may find some other note.

Regards,

Atish

[Former Member]

H Atish

Thanks for your reply. Can u clarify some of my queries as I am not from technical back ground.

1. But if u see the note 385830 where the programme has been terminated is also not required to implement in ECC 6.0, but if u can see in my case they have implemented that note.

2. If u see the notes in SAP they have mentioned corrections for versions, but why i dont know we have note 385830 in our progarmme though we are in ECC 6.0.

3. The reason I was mainly asking for note 556000 is the programme was terminated in 53 line where there is note 385830 implemented.

Thanks in advance for ur reply

Suresh

[Former Member]

Hi Suresh,

These could be because your system was upgraded from a previous version which had this requirement for that note.

Even so, if it's implemented, you can revert it back( Technical Team can ) and then apply the new note using SNOTE transaction ( BASIS activity).

I guess then your issue would be resolved.

Regards

Nishant

[Former Member]

Hi Suresh,

Let me explain you logic behind notes. They are most of the time version dependent.

As this issue was identified by SAP in earlier versions so they may have come up with Note and later rectified the same using support packs or upgrades.

I think this answers your point 1 and 2.

And there may be other reason for the termination at that line. You may be able to find some other Note. If you are unable to find, raise an OSS message with SAP and they will provide the solution as it is dump in standard code.

Regards,

Atish

[Former Member]

Hi Nishant

Thanks for u r clarification. The note 556000 is solution for the short dump due to 385830 . My question is even though version was upgraded the note will be have same effect, will it cause short dump. AM I RIGHT?. I may not recommend to revert the note back, bcoz i am not sure about consequences. If answer to my earlier question is YES then i will go for above said note .

thanks in advance for your reply.

Suresh

[Former Member]

Hi Atish

Thanks for your clarification, Ok then I will go for OSS message.

Thanks again

Suresh

[Former Member]

Hi Suresh,

In my honest opinion, you can just go and revert the original note since all the other notes are for 47C. None of 'em are valid for ECC 6.0 and though I am not sure of the dump, I am sure they can cause errors in the system

Basically you can revert in DEV then move it to Quality and do your testing. If it's not correct you can always revert it back

Regards

Nishant

[Former Member]

Problem is with Userexit

[Former Member]

Hi Suresh,

Can you please provide the details about the resolution of this problem. Which userexit is the issue and how you rectified it.

I am also getting the same problem.

Thanks in Advace !!

Pradeep