on 10-19-2007 6:58 AM
Hi!
In case of import P.O. scenario, while capturing customs duties in MIRO, the sequence of condition types is not as defined in P.O. ( no GR bassed IV, MIRO before MIGO).
For example, sequence defined in P.O :
1. Basic duty
2. CVD
3. Spl. Addl. Cess
4. E.Cess on CVD
5. S&H E.Cess on CVD
6. Customs E.Cess etc...
While capturing the customs duties in MIRO, after entering the P.O. no, the system should propose the same sequence of condition types as defined above (i.e., P.O). But it is proposing in the following sequence.
1. S&H E.Cess on CVD
2. Basic duty
3. E.Cess on CVD
4. CVD
5. Customs E.Cess
6. Spl. Addl. Cess
The sequence of condtion types defined in pricing procedure is also same as shown in P.O.
Can any one suggest the reason for this issue. Your valid suggestions will be highly appriciated.
Thanks & Regards
Gopi Chand.
Hi!
Can any one suggest the solution for this issue please...
Thanks in advance
Gopi Chand
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
Hi VS!
Thanks for the reply.
Actually I have already verified the pricing procedure for this concern and it was not maintained like that. For every condition type, different step with counter zero was mentioned.
10 - 0 - BCD
20 - 0 - CVD
30 - 0 - Ecess on CVD etc..
Even then the problem is coming.
Can you please suggest any other solution.
Thanks & Regards,
Gopi Chand.
User | Count |
---|---|
70 | |
14 | |
8 | |
6 | |
5 | |
5 | |
5 | |
4 | |
3 | |
3 |
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.