Sequence of condition types in MIRO for import P.O

[Former Member]

Hi!

In case of import P.O. scenario, while capturing customs duties in MIRO, the sequence of condition types is not as defined in P.O. ( no GR bassed IV, MIRO before MIGO).

For example, sequence defined in P.O :

1. Basic duty

2. CVD

3. Spl. Addl. Cess

4. E.Cess on CVD

5. S&H E.Cess on CVD

6. Customs E.Cess etc...

While capturing the customs duties in MIRO, after entering the P.O. no, the system should propose the same sequence of condition types as defined above (i.e., P.O). But it is proposing in the following sequence.

1. S&H E.Cess on CVD

2. Basic duty

3. E.Cess on CVD

4. CVD

5. Customs E.Cess

6. Spl. Addl. Cess

The sequence of condtion types defined in pricing procedure is also same as shown in P.O.

Can any one suggest the reason for this issue. Your valid suggestions will be highly appriciated.

Thanks & Regards

Gopi Chand.

[Former Member]

Hi!

Can any one suggest the solution for this issue please...

Thanks in advance

Gopi Chand

[vikas_soni2]

Hvae u kept the conition on the same level and differentiated using a counter? Eg.

10-10 BCD

10-20 CVD.

and so on.

This problem might occur in such a case

If yes, maintain all the conditions on iffernt steps and do not assign counter.

Hope this helps. Rewards, if useful.

Best regards,

VS

[Former Member]

Hi VS!

Thanks for the reply.

Actually I have already verified the pricing procedure for this concern and it was not maintained like that. For every condition type, different step with counter zero was mentioned.

10 - 0 - BCD

20 - 0 - CVD

30 - 0 - Ecess on CVD etc..

Even then the problem is coming.

Can you please suggest any other solution.

Thanks & Regards,

Gopi Chand.