on 10-15-2007 10:06 AM
Hi there,
I've integrated an ALV control and now I'm facing the following problem:
When I use the ALVs sort function, the exception "lead selection not set" occurs. I mapped my context node TEST to the interface node DATA of the ALV component usage. And when I execute the sort function and try to read the lead selection information, I debugged that the lead selection information is lost. That happens when the mappee of the node TEST is retrieved by the context nodes Method get_attribute. An initialization does not take place, although the context node attribute "initialize lead selection" is set to true. Is that a common problem or do I handle the alv control in a wrong way?
Kind regards,
Albert
>
> Hi there,
>
> I've integrated an ALV control and now I'm facing the following problem:
>
> When I use the ALVs sort function, the exception "lead selection not set" occurs. I mapped my context node TEST to the interface node DATA of the ALV component usage. And when I execute the sort function and try to read the lead selection information, I debugged that the lead selection information is lost. That happens when the mappee of the node TEST is retrieved by the context nodes Method get_attribute. An initialization does not take place, although the context node attribute "initialize lead selection" is set to true. Is that a common problem or do I handle the alv control in a wrong way?
>
> Kind regards,
> Albert
Have you done any coding in WDDOMIDIFYVIEW method of the view in which you are writing the node TEST. If yes then lead selection will not work. the reason is stated earlier in Uday's note.
Remove the code from WDDOMODIFYVIEW method and implement it in some other way.
I have specified this in the thread which is also specified by Uday
Regards,
Feroz
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
Hi Albert,
This is a known limitation of the Web Dynpro ALV which arises during sorting of your ALV. Please go through Thomas Jung's comments in this [thread|;.
Regards,
Uday
Am pasting the same in here for your observation:
This is a known limitation of the Web Dynpro ALV when sorting. Here is the explanation from the online help:
Important Exception: Sorting
Here ALV has to use the entire dataset so that the data records can be arranged in the new order. For this
purpose, the ALV component temporarily takes control of the internal data table and invalidates the corresponding
context node of your application during this time. This ensures that the application cannot access the context
node while the ALV component is editing the internal data table.
Once the internal data table has been resorted, ALV rebuilds the context node, releases
it again for the application, and displays the data accordingly.
This ensures that the internal data table is never copied. This is important because large volumes of data would
considerably impact performance and memory space.
When you are planning your application, note the following side-effects of this mechanism:
u25CF When the context node is invalidated, information about current selections, and in particular the lead selection, is lost.
u25CF If your application has created subnodes for the context node, (master-detail scenario), these subnodes are
lost as soon as the ALV component invalidates the context node. If the application then tries to access the
subnodes, a runtime error occurs.
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
Hi there,
I was facing exactly the same issue.
It can be solved bay initializing the lead-selection with an Index:
get element via lead selection
lo_el_resultats = lo_nd_resultats->get_element( ).
@TODO handle not set lead selection
IF lo_el_resultats IS INITIAL.
alternative access via index
lo_el_resultats = lo_nd_resultats->get_element( index = 1 ).
ENDIF.
BR,
Mickaë
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
User | Count |
---|---|
88 | |
10 | |
10 | |
9 | |
7 | |
7 | |
6 | |
5 | |
4 | |
4 |
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.