on 10-09-2007 11:45 PM
hi all,
The Ship To address name was not being synchronized on the order when it comes over from e-commerce. This is a huge problem as the name of the address is the name of the company the order is shipping to.
is any one of you also face the same prob. Let me know any solution for this if you know..
We had this same problem. We fixed the issue by writing the ship-to name in a udt in webtools. Than wrote a program using the di in sbo to read the udt and update the sales order. If you use Pick Pack Manager, be sure to update the order rows ship-to.
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
Hi Philip,
This is by design.
Webtools allows the customer to select a billing address as a shipping address. If this happens this happens the order will not synchronize if the address name is set.
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
This is also a problem for us.
Within SAP we use the address name field as part of the address. For some addresses it more relevant than others.
The synch process does not take a direct copy of the shipping address stored in the webtools order and populate order.address2.
Instead, it must do a look up of the address and populate everything into order.address2 except for shipping address name, and the county.
I do not understand the logic behind this, and certainly the county field does seem to be an oversight?.
We also use a warehouse addon called Radio Beacon, which automates the order flow, sending any new sales orders into Radio Beacon for picking and delivery. Hopefully I will be able to get the system amended to pick up the address from the webtools address UDF's during order download. It is this address that will be used to govern the delivery of the item, so the above problem is more of a cosmetic problem for me, but possibly not so for other customers?.
The WT is currently built, the billing address can be used as a ship to address.
If this is done, the order will fail to synch because this is illegal in B1. The current solution is to set the address2 field but not the address name field.
Incidentally, since the free text address on the order is edittable, there is no guarantee that the address in address name is actually the address listed in the address2 field.
User | Count |
---|---|
99 | |
11 | |
11 | |
6 | |
6 | |
4 | |
4 | |
3 | |
3 | |
3 |
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.