on 10-08-2007 6:59 AM
Hi all,
For variant configuration,we use header material type as KMAT&planning stratergy 25.
I have following doubts about vaiant configurations.
1)Wheather can we use repetitive manufacturing for variant configuation scenario ?
In repetitive manufacturing we have to define atleast one production version while in variant configutration,we have superBOM&superrouting,no specific production version.
2)Also can we use planning stratergy 40 for KMAT material?If yes,how BOM &routing will be exploded from superBOM&super task list?
Regards,
Shailendra
Hi
We can use VC with REM. U can assign strategy 25 or 81 and use the Make to order REM profile and backflush using the sales order or planned order.
If u use 81 the advantage is that u need not run the MRP for a planned order, as it is created automatically.
the system will backflush the quantites according to the sales order.
Regards
Chandra
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
Shailendra,
1.
If the business process is suiting REM and only concern is final product configurable, then I would suggest you to go fro Hybrid. i.e you can go for REM till Subassembly stage and for Final Sellable product alone Discrete with Configuration.
So what I intend to say is that REM is not possible for a Configured Product, and alternate can be as suggested by me.
2.
Planning Stratgey 40 cannot be used, as this strategy/requirement type/requirment class derived <b>does not allow Configuration</b>. If you are looking for a combination of MTS and MTO type of scenario in configuration then please have a look at using strategies 56, 89.
Regards,
Prasobh
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
User | Count |
---|---|
107 | |
12 | |
11 | |
6 | |
5 | |
4 | |
4 | |
3 | |
3 | |
3 |
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.