on 10-06-2007 12:33 PM
Hi
I posted a document in a company code for which splitting is active. I could see the document posted under the following tables:
BSEG
BKPF
FAGLFLEXT
FAGLFLEXA
I dont really care whether it is posted in GLT0 or not.
Now my question under what circumstances BSEG_ADD & BKPF_ADD will get updated. I was searching for some good documentation but of no avail. Any input on this which would help in understanding the posting logic to these tables would be highly appreciated.
Thanks for the input. Do u mean to say that SAP has created a dummy table without any purpose? I am further surprised.....by your answer.
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
Thanks a lot for at least this half reply.I greatly appreciate ur help. Client has been asking this question and no one could provide any answer. I can atleast manage the situation now. Thanks once again. I am looking forward to hearing your answer for the other table update also soon.
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
BKPF_ADD is not used any where. To check if a table is used anywhere, you can use the t-code SE11 and click on where used list. Select all the check boxes and run a search.
While BSEG_ADD offers the programs that uses (specially those for additional ledgers), BKPF_ADD yields no results. This is a dummy table.
Any answers???
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
I can partly answer your question.
When a document is posted only to a non leading ledger then the it is getting posted to BSEG_ADD table. But still the the header data is stored in BKPF. I still need to investigate which type of posting will hit BKPF_ADD table. Quite interesting. Incidentally this is also getting posted to FAGLFLEXA & T table. Further the document that is getting posted to BSEG_ADD will have the status L that is posting not in leading ledger.
User | Count |
---|---|
108 | |
12 | |
11 | |
6 | |
5 | |
4 | |
3 | |
3 | |
3 | |
3 |
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.