on 10-04-2007 1:01 PM
Is there pegging relationships between SNP orders? If it's so, what are the differences between pegging of SNP and PP/DS orders.
Thanks
Hi Mikalai,
SNP has 3 solvers for rough-cut capacity planning i.e. Heuristics, Capability-To-Match and Optimizer. Heuristics and Optimizer are time-series based solvers and pegging is not supported using these solvers. The only solver that is order-based is CTM and with CTM pegging is possible. Even though CTM is different from rest of the SNP, it is often gets clubbed with SNP functionality.
SNP can only schedule to a minimum of one day granularity and where as PP/DS can schedule to second. As far as pegging methods are concerned, fixed & dynamic pegging are available for both CTM & PP/DS.
Hope this helps.
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
Heuristics and Optimizer generally aggregate requirements and creates receipts. CTM does order by order planning, and can do both fixed and dynamic pegging. Technically Pegging is the same in PPDS as well. usually in short term we tend to have fixed pegging more.
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
User | Count |
---|---|
7 | |
4 | |
3 | |
2 | |
2 | |
1 | |
1 | |
1 | |
1 | |
1 |
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.