IDOC bundling - the "trick" with the occurance change is not working

[Former Member]

Hi Gurus .

In our scenario we are creating multiple idocs from file . We have changed the occurance IDOC ... and after the mapping idoc XML is like below ..it is successfully thorough the XI

<CRMXIF_ORDER_SAVE_M01>

<IDOC BEGIN = "1">..........</IDOC>

<IDOC BEGIN = "1">..........</IDOC>

</CRMXIF_ORDER_SAVE_M01>

But the problem is that only one IDOc is reaching in the reciver side ,(It sholuld be 2 in this scenario).

Has anybody faced thsi problem before ???

Regards

Goutam

[steven_dierick · Accepted solution]

Hey,

Has anyone found a reason why this is happening?

I've the same problem.

I send two Idoc with a file.

I the message monitoring I see that the payload contains two <IDOC> structures.

But only the first one reaches the R3 system.

Steven

[Former Member · Accepted solution]

Hello Steve,

Process what you have done is correct.

Check if you are collecting IDOCS with different RCVPFC.

RCVPFC in the control record.

It will collect only one set of RCVPFC.

Regards,

[Former Member]

Is that something to do with the Adpater ...I am bit cluless ..

Same thing is working in other scenarios..

Ragrds

Goutam

[Former Member]

Michal ,

I have done it exactly that ...(following ur blog)..

Regards

Goutam

[Former Member]

I have used unedited idoc as message interface and sm58 is showing there is any error

Regards

Goutam

[Former Member]

Hi Michal , both the idocs are not empty...

Kind regards

Goutam

[Shabarish_Nair]

did you use the unedited IDoc in your Message interface ?

Also check if there are any traces in SM58 in R3.

[MichalKrawczyk]

Hi,

this means you didn't do it <b>exactly</b> as per my blog

there is no other way

Regards,

michal

[MichalKrawczyk]

hi,

>>>>Has anybody faced thsi problem before ???

it will not work if the second (or first) IDOC is empty for example

Regards,

michal