on 09-06-2007 8:10 AM
Dear XIers,
Is it mandatory to have exact message structures for both outbound and inbound message types in Interface Mapping (only JAVA/XSLT mapping).
Thanks,
jangili
Hi
No need to consider the similar mesage types since java / xslt functions would biuild the target message
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
Hi,
Is it mandatory to have exact message structures for both outbound and inbound message types in Interface Mapping (only JAVA/XSLT mapping).
No.
Firslty during the mapping of message types we specify how the data is to be transformed from the source structure to the target structure.This takes care of the structure of message types.
While in interface mapping we just speicfy which mapping program is to be used by the interfaces.
<b>Cheers,
*RAJ*</b>
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
<i>Is it mandatory to have exact message structures for both outbound and inbound message types in Interface Mapping (only JAVA/XSLT mapping).</i>
>>
in case of JAVA or XSLT mapping, your target Message ie inbound message type can be anything. It can be a dummy MT since your mapping program ie Java or XSLT will make the resulting structure, and the target message type / interface has no direct effect on it.
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
User | Count |
---|---|
93 | |
10 | |
10 | |
9 | |
9 | |
7 | |
6 | |
5 | |
5 | |
4 |
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.