on 08-09-2007 9:59 PM
Is it possible to send the entire payload into a node on the target where this node is a string which can hold the payload? If so please let me know how to do it.
My recommendation would be then to handle this a completely different way. Take your receiver DT and the node you want to map to and set the type from xsd:string to click on Search help and pick the sender DT your getting the data from, then in mapping, map all the values straight over to the same fields in that node. It would be in the same format as if you tried to do it with a string, so it shouldn't cause problems.
This is only if you can modify the receiver DT though.
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
Is this payload going to consist of XML?
what is your receiver?
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
Hey
could you please clear one thing for us .
do u want the whole XML payload in ur single receiver tag? or u want all the values in the receiver tag.
suppose sender is
<Recordset>
<Tag1>Emp</Tag1>
<Tag2>Eid</Tag2>
<Recordset>
now on receiver side do u want the XML to be
<Recordset>
<MainTag><Tag1>Emp</Tag1><Tag2>Eid</Tag2></MainTag>
<Recordset>
like the above?
or you want
the receiver XML to be like
<Recordset>
<maintag>EmpEid</mainTag>
or like this one?
please let us know this so that we are able to help you more
Thanx
Aamir suhail
I don't think so with standard functions.
but other way is possible.
you can parse a large string into multiple traget fields using "substring" function.
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
What is your source interface?
You can probably concatinate all the nodes of the souce together into the one entry, and if there are many record sets use a UDF as Queue.
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
Hey
yes,its possible.you can simple concatenate all the sender fields and send that to one receiver field
use the standard concat function if u dont have too many sender fields,but if u have lots of them,then use a UDF that will make the mapping more clear and readable
Thanx
Aamir suhail
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
User | Count |
---|---|
91 | |
10 | |
10 | |
9 | |
9 | |
7 | |
6 | |
5 | |
5 | |
4 |
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.