on 07-30-2007 8:31 AM
Hi Crew,
I have done this one(without BPM)
https://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/sdn/weblogs?blog=/pub/wlg/3115. [original link is broken] [original link is broken] [original link is broken] [original link is broken]
I understood that there cannot be multiple receiver services.
This message splitting can be done only with one sender and one receiver business services (with many communication channels) without BPM.
Am I right?
Are there anymore limitations than this?
Regards,
Karthik kaveriselvan.
Please reply to this discussion and clarify the doubt!
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
If there are only two receiver agreements then the above mentioned error "No receiver agreement found" occurs.
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
<i>select multiple receivers using the + button.</i>
one sender service.
two receiver service referring to one target interface each with one communicaiton channel each.
Two interface determination for two business services and they both are refering to the same enhanced interface mapping.
Created receiver determination and added the two receiver service to it, but when looking at the configuration overview for receiver determinaiton, for each service, both the target interfaces used in interface mapping are listed and the reciever determination shows "Does not exist".
When I run the scenario, I get "No receiver agreement found" error.
Please calrify how many receiver agreements have to be configured and how?
Thanks
karthik
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
Hi,
In addition to other posts: Dymanic Configuration (ASMA) is common to all the Messages that are split.
You cannot have seperate Dymanic Configuration for each one of the split messages.
Regards,
Sudharshan N A
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
Prateek,
<i>Multiple receiver business service is possible without BPM?</i>
When we go for more than one receiver business services, while configuring interface determination, which receiver service will you select? so in that case do we have to have two interface determination?
Please try it and let me know.
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
<i>When we go for more than one receiver business services, while configuring interface determination, which receiver service will you select? </i>
>>
select multiple receivers using the + button.
<i>so in that case do we have to have two interface determination? </i>
>>
yes, for reach receiver you will have its own interface determination.
another prominent limitation is;
Only those adapters that run on the Adapter Engine are supported. So the IDoc scenarios cannot be done in this case. Also the Java proxy runtime is also not supported.
More @ http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw04/helpdata/en/42/f3b31d48fb1bc8e10000000a11466f/content.htm
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
<i>This message splitting can be done only with one sender and one receiver business services (with many communication channels) without BPM.</i>
More than one receiver business service possible without BPM.
Only 1 sender possible without BPM
Regards,
Prateek
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
Prabhu,
Even in this case you cannot have multiple receiver business services in Integration Directory.
Please comment on the same...
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
yes with this particular scenario there is only one sender service but with BPM u can have mutiple sender service. But in the case of receiver service u can have mutiple recv's in this case
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
User | Count |
---|---|
98 | |
11 | |
11 | |
10 | |
10 | |
8 | |
6 | |
5 | |
4 | |
4 |
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.