on 07-10-2007 6:20 AM
Hi All,
Can anyone tell me which adapters are better in performance wise
Thanks
Anu,
I think its not possible to compare Adapters based on performance. For example if you want to connect to DB then the only option is JDBC, how can u compare this with other adapter. The possiblity u can compare XI with other tools. Am I right?
Best regards,
raj
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
Anu,
Again I don't know how to answer for this. It all depends on your business requirement. There is no any general adapters which will be used. Some clients will finish their work within say Sender SOAP and receiver R/3 or some clients need to work only with File to File etc.. We can't give general statement that this adapter is used commonly.
Anu, I think it helps u.
Best regards,
raj.
File to Proxy
/people/prateek.shah/blog/2005/06/14/file-to-r3-via-abap-proxy
Proxy to File,
/people/ravikumar.allampallam/blog/2005/03/14/abap-proxies-in-xiclient-proxy
Activate ABAP Proxies SAP system
/people/vijaya.kumari2/blog/2006/01/26/how-do-you-activate-abap-proxies
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
hi,
It depends on the requirements, like synch/asynch communications, volumes and so on but in general I would say:
1) proxy: great performances and monitoring capabilities, immediate application acknowledgement, less predelivered content available (compared with Idocs)
2) idocs: great performances and monitoring capabilities, not immediate application acknowledgement, a lot of standard content, and technology well known and Integrated (I mean with non SAP system)
3) BAPI's, if based on IDocs see 2, if pure RFC see point 4.
4) RFC, less monitoring/tracing functionalities, sometimes difficult to be integrated with non SAP systems via XI
5) for custom data I would go for proxy or Idocs, but proxy would probably be my first choice.
have a look at the below link also...
Choosing the right Adapter to Integrate with a SAP system
/people/ravikumar.allampallam/blog/2005/08/14/choose-the-right-adapter-to-integrate-with-sap-systems
hope this helpful...
Message was edited by:
sasitharan
Message was edited by:
sasitharan
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
<b>file-proxy</b>
Data from file are to be proceesed and posted as documents in R3 based on validations.
<b>proxy-file</b>
you create a sale order and the detials of SO's that are created needs to be stored in a file system which is accessed by a DMS application.
Note: The above scenario could be done using idocs also but for data loads we opt proxy
hi anushree,
>>i m not clear with the concept of proxy
plz go thru:
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw04/helpdata/en/14/80243b4a66ae0ce10000000a11402f/frameset.htm
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw04/helpdata/en/14/80243b4a66ae0ce10000000a11402f/frameset.htm
>>can u send me the simple scenario for implimenting it..
ABAP Proxy to File
/people/ravikumar.allampallam/blog/2005/03/14/abap-proxies-in-xiclient-proxy
File to ABAP Proxy
/people/prateek.shah/blog/2005/06/14/file-to-r3-via-abap-proxy
[reward if helpful]
regards,
latika.
Very vague question. The choice is always dependent on ur scenario requiremnet.
HTTP and IDOC adapters resides on ABAP stack and perform well.
Other adapters are on Java stack.
But the performance barely depends upon type of adapter. it rather depends upon the type of message and volume of those messages.
Regards,
Prateek
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
User | Count |
---|---|
84 | |
24 | |
12 | |
9 | |
7 | |
6 | |
5 | |
5 | |
4 | |
4 |
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.