Do I use BPM correlation correctly

[Former Member]

I have a BPM and it calls 3 RFCs

Sender -> BPM -> RFC1(sync) -> RFC2(sync) -> RFC3(sync)

And the data is master/detail, but the sender send by detail, not master. It means, if a master has 3 details then sender sends 3 messages to BPM. But I don't want to run the 3 messages parallel.

Therefore, I use the master no. of the detail message as a correlation in BPM, is it correct? Because I found sometimes I still get parallel BPMs.

[Former Member]

Hi Denis,

sorry it is not really clear to me do you mean that if you have 3 details you want them to be inside one BPM which would perform 3 succesive RFC calls?

Then correlction have to be build on master level

BR, Artem

Remember points

[Former Member]

I want 3 successive RFC calls, because they will lock the same record. If they run parallel, I'll get "lock" problem.