on 06-19-2007 3:46 AM
Hi
If rfc and bapi are available for the similar task to implement ...........as a XI consultant which one you will suggest ?? If so could you please explain me the reason for the same ??
thanks
kumar
Hi,
From an XI Implementation perspective,
BAPI's do not have a implict COMMIT associated with them and so , in the receiver RFC adapter you need to provide the COMMIT HANDLING FOR BAPI CALLS. This option was avilable from SP 14.
Prior to that you had to writter a warpper RFC and import it into XI and use this instead of the BAPI.
The RFC's conatin an Implicit commit so no such issue here.
regards
Bhavesh
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
User | Count |
---|---|
93 | |
10 | |
10 | |
9 | |
9 | |
7 | |
6 | |
5 | |
5 | |
4 |
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.