SWCVs VS. Namespaces

[Former Member]

Dear all,

I'm having a discussion over here concerning the organisation of our XI Repository. The discussion is whether to define different systems in different SWCVs or to include them in one SWCV and define a namespace for each system.

My believe is that you should create a SWCV for eacht system, and in complex situations even create one for mappings and other shared objects.

Any thoughts to back up this story?

Cheers.

[Former Member · Accepted solution]

Hi Schotanus,

Have a look into this blog

/people/thorsten.nordholmsbirk/blog/2006/07/25/structuring-integration-repository-content--part-1-software-component-versions

Regards,

Jai Shankar

[Former Member · Accepted solution]

Hi Schotanus,

latterally speaking SWCV and namespace are to logically group together the objects of IR.Generally 1 SWCV means 1 system.....

Cheers

Biplab

[Shabarish_Nair]

Well, it would be ideal to have a SWCV for a particular system and namespaces under it to group the interfaces that are involved with the particular system.