on 06-06-2007 8:09 AM
Hi,
I was wondering how big (number of records) are your biggest value mapping talbes
(use in mass replication scenarios)
did you see any performance impacts if there are really huge ?
BTW
I don't want any links etc. just numbers from real systems
Thank you,
Regads,
michal
Hi Michal,
Gud question...Mines arnd 200 entries..
No problems known as of now..
btw how abt u?
Cheers,
Sumit
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
I have a table with over 130 mappings.
These are in multiple fields in HR idocs in different segments within the same idoc - these idocs are pretty huge.
I also have conditions as well - so if cttyp is = 006 then map through these 130 mappings!
If you are familiar with HR idocs as well, when you get to infotype 0008, you get lga01, lga02, 03, 04... - lga40.
The processing is really fast, suprisingly.
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
Very small, less than 10. I have same concerns about performance and also about maintainability.
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
User | Count |
---|---|
81 | |
10 | |
10 | |
9 | |
7 | |
6 | |
6 | |
5 | |
4 | |
4 |
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.