on 05-16-2007 8:29 AM
Hi all,
Please, let me know the differences between
eCATT vs Mercury QTP,
Thanks,
kalyan chakravarthy
Hi Kalyan,
SAP eCATT is a automation tool meant for functional testing in SAP. It comes with WAS. Latest version is WAS 6.40. It is made in ABAP.
QTP is Mercury's tool, which is a third party tool for automation testing. The language used here is VB Script.
Both the tools are good. But the only drawback with eCATT as of now is that it can execute web based SAP transactions except web dynpro. So if the testing of SRM, CRM etc is involved, one is forced to use QTP.
QTP takes the wrapping of eCATT and executes in SAP.
If only SAPGUI based transactions are involved in testing than eCATT is the best tool to be used. And if web based transactions are also involved, forced to go for QTP.
Hope this clears your query.
PS If the answer solves your query, plz close the thread by rewarding each reply.
Regards
Sapna Modi
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
Hi
ECATT and QTP both automated testing tools.
Better one is ECATT because is based upon object oriented methodology.
QTP is a mercury product where as ECATT is of SAP.
Secondly from ecatt you can qtp scripts run etc.
Even in ECATT you can create a script a combination of ECATT and QTP
Please refer to my weblogs.
/people/community.user/blog/2007/01/02/integrating-ecatt-mercury-qtp-part-1
/people/community.user/blog/2007/01/15/integrating-ecatt-mercury-qtp-part-2
/people/community.user/blog/2007/01/22/integrating-ecatt-mercury-qtp-part-3
Please reward points.
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
User | Count |
---|---|
78 | |
10 | |
9 | |
7 | |
6 | |
6 | |
5 | |
5 | |
5 | |
4 |
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.