on 05-10-2007 7:50 PM
1. Extended classic Purchase Orders are fully approved (no approval required workflow) in SRM - status "HELD"
2. When we process PO and "order" - the PO is transmitted to R/3 (great, everything seems to be there).
3. There are no messages associated with the SRM (ECPO) purchase order in R3.
Do we need additional configuration to associate a new message type with the SRM ECPO? Should a "message" come along with the extended classic PO as it is transferred to R3?
Hope everyone out there is doing well - !
Best, Jim Stewart
Publisher
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
Hi Jim,
We faced the same problem, but since we are in NetWeaver2004s & ECC 6.0 the new enhancement framework provided by SAP helped us a lot.
Please follow these steps:
1) Maintain the output determination config in R/3
2) In the FM BBP_PO_INBOUND just do a souce code enhancement at the first line. and add the below code which will make R/3 to perform output determination
CLEAR NO_MESSAGING.
This just solved our problem. Since this is an source code enhancement you have no need to modify the std program as well.
Regards
Kathirvel
Jim,
If I understood correctly,
You are on Extended classic scenario. You want to give out puts from R/3 backend.
In such a case, you have to maintain the condition records for the ECPO type purchase orders, and you need to have a message type, include this message type in the message schema. All this configuration has to be done in R/3 side.
If I did not understand your question properly, please explain.
Regards,
DV
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
Hi
We are facing the same issue. Will update you soon, how to go about it, very shortly.
Cheers
- Atul
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
Of course, our goal is to have messages / output associated with the R/3 PO so that we can print the PO, fax it, etc.
Thank you for any ideas - Best, Jim
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
User | Count |
---|---|
1 | |
1 | |
1 | |
1 |
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.