Internal Order Settlement AVC for Fund Management

[former_member335340]

Hi expert,

We have succeeded to make internal order settlement created for FM document. It's mean, in KO88, AVC for FM is active. But, what I can not understand, why does these internal order settlement checking is not following my rule on FM tolerance profile? It must be error (because budget is exceeded), but it was not error. Why was this happening? 

Thanks for any reply,

Dian EP

[iklovski]

Hi,

First of all, re-initialize your AVC ledger via FMAVCREINIT. Then, set a trace in FMDERIVE and make a settlement in order to make sure that correct FM address is derived. Then, you can set a trace in tolerance profiles derivation to check if the correct profile is derived. Follow, these steps one by one and if again no control is performed, give a feedback with screenshots.

Regards,

Eli

[former_member335340]

Hi Eli,

Thanks for your reply. I've followed your steps but still FM not checked, but FM document is created on settlement internal order (KO88).

     

[iklovski]

I see that you have 'warning' message assigned to your tolerance profiles. Normally, in mass processing, e.g. KO88, warning messages are not shown up. Only, errors will be triggerred.

[former_member335340]

Ok, then I've changed it to error message for all level, but still there is nothing happent:

[iklovski]

You have to re-initialize your ledger via FMAVCREINIT. Then, check what is the logic for your AVC ledger in IMG 'Define Activation of Availability Control'. Finally, set a trace in tolerance profile derivation strategy (IMG 'Define Derivation Strategy for Tolerance Profiles') and make sure that your profile ZP3A is triggered.

[former_member335340]

Hi Eli,

I've done that (FMAVCREINIT) and here is my "Define Activation of Availability Control" is...but still there's nothing happend.

[iklovski]

What happens if you try to post FI document on that address? Do you have an error then? What about setting a trace for tolerance profiles?

[former_member335340]

All other scenario, other than KO88 for Internal Order is working OK.

[former_member335340 · Accepted solution]

I'm using S4HANA 1511 on premise...is it any relevancy from SAP update?

[iklovski]

Sorry, I almost forgot... There is a note on this

https://launchpad.support.sap.com/#/notes/1927177/E

What I've had in mind, that KO88 ignores just warnings, but actually it ignores all AVC messages. Consult the note I provided... You can change this behaviour by forcing AVC via BADI BUAVC_CHECK_RESTRICT.

[former_member335340]

Ok Eli, thank you very much for your valuable info....I'll test it and will give you information of the result...

dianep

[former_member335340]

Sorry Eli, before i'm going through with implementing the note. I've read the relevance note

755495 - Allow Availability Control for Goods Receipts

and found it "...The manual and automatic correction instructions of this SAP Note are only relevant, if you work with the EA-PS release 2.00 or 5.00. ". And I'm working with SAP PS 800

Is it OK ?

Thanks,

Dian EP

[former_member335340]

OK Eli...I've implement it...and finally it's working

Next, I'll test other scenario, hope it wont affect those...

Thank you very much Eli....

Dian EP

[iklovski]

Good. You can close the thread, then. By the way, I gave reference to note 1927177... 755495 refers to another AVC modification speaking of GR.