on 05-03-2007 4:03 AM
Hi all,
I was going through the BPM logs and in one of the logs Jai Shankar had suggested that "we don't need a receiver aggrement if our target MI is Abstract"
Now I have several questions
1. In what cases will the target MI be Abstract? Why and when would we do that?
2. Why don't we need a receiver aggrement if our target MI is Abstract? What is the logic behind that.
3. Is there some other cases when Receiver aggrement is not needed.
Thank You
Hi Sonia,
1. Target MI will be abstract when our recipient is a Integration Process (ccBPM).
2. As far as my understanding goes, ccBPM is an executable process. It will not write a file or update any database after receiving the message, rather it will start executing the steps that you have designed in the IR. Receiver agreement actually determines <b>how the receipient will 'act' after receiving the message. Since the act is already defined (in IR design time), there is no need to define it again in Receiver Agreement.</b>
3. In all other cases, receiver agreement is needed.
Regards,
Amitabha
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
Hi Sonia,
>>. In what cases will the target MI be Abstract? Why and when would we do that?
Abstract MI are used with in BPM. So if you are sending a msg into a BPM(the target is BPM), then you dont need a Receiver Agreement.
>>2. Why don't we need a receiver aggrement if our target MI is Abstract? What is the logic behind that.
Receiver Agreement is just to create a binding between your communication channel with your scenario, but imagine when the target is BPM you dont need any commn. channel at all. So no receiver agreement.
>>3. Is there some other cases when Receiver aggrement is not needed.
No. In all other cases, Receiver agreement is mandatory.
Regards,
Jai Shankar
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
hey
can u send the link as to where u read this.i m under the impression that receiver agreement is required under all cases
thanx
ahmad
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
User | Count |
---|---|
80 | |
9 | |
9 | |
7 | |
7 | |
7 | |
6 | |
5 | |
5 | |
4 |
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.