on 08-17-2016 1:39 PM
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
Some of the visualizations are using the NavTec (sp?) maps which will only show cities over 100K ; no settings will change that unless you change your master data to reflect the closest largest city (meaning if your data shows Westchester, New York, and it does not appear, change the city to New York City which does have a population over 100K)
The other option is ESRI, as far as I know/recall
Hi Sherif,
As Tammy mentioned the NavTec database shows only cities with population more than 100k. A simple workaround would be to build a table with cities, latitude and longitude as columns. Then we can merge these columns with the main table and build the Geo hierarchy using Lat and Long instead of names.
Please let me know if there are any questions or comments.
Thank you,
Varun Anand
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
Hi Varun,
I am reading data from BW Query and my customer prefer to get all information from backend without any other external files excel or csv. I know I have a problem with the Master data, it is not cleansed and not rightly maintained but we are on it.
I need to find a workaround given the current situation. I created an account on Arcgis maps as you have a 60 days free trial then I went to Lumira, settings, maps and entered the account and password then went to Visualize tap and tried to see if there is any connection between Lumira and the online maps but confronted with a problem concerning the proxy.
did you try something like that before?
rgds, Sherif
Hi Sherif,
I'm not sure if the ESRI maps will resolve your current problem. Since we need to create a geo hierarchy to use in the maps, you might encounter the same unresolved locations.
I would suggest you merge a csv with lat long values and see if you get the desired results. If yes, then you replicate the same in the back end system.
Thank you,
Varun Anand
User | Count |
---|---|
81 | |
25 | |
12 | |
9 | |
7 | |
6 | |
5 | |
5 | |
4 | |
4 |
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.