on 08-02-2016 3:45 PM
Hello everybody,
we have the following, simple situation:
We want to perform a material to material posting with consignment stock. Nothing else.
When trying this, we get the following error message:
As I know, the movement type is determined by the /SCWM/TIMB* tables. In most cases, when posting something, initially posting string reference 411 is found according to /SCWM/TIMBWA. As we are just posting material to material unrestricted, we should usually get the posting string reference 309 according to /SCWM/TIMBWAXTRA. But /SCWM/TIMBWAUSG determines 311 as PSR, when consignment stock is posted with PSR 411 (without changing the consignment stock usage - usage: C to C).
AND it looks like the system takes /SCWM/TIMBWAUSG earlier into account than /SCWM/TIMBWAXTRA. Otherwise, we wouldn't end up with 311 in our case.
Now, we get to the core of the problem:
The TIMB-tables are system tables and therefore not to be customized. We should instead use the customizing transaction "Define Customer-Specific Movement Types". So in our case, we would connect the PSR 311 to Mvmt-type 309 to get a proper posting.
BUT, in /SCWM/TIMBWAUFC, field combinations for posting changes are defined for the posting string references. Here, it is defined that 311 doesn't allow product changes and 309 does. But these is also taken into account when customizing the Customer-Specific Movement Types and we get the following error message when trying to connect 311 to 309:
My question to you guys: What can we do to make mat-to-mat posting with consignment stock possible, without changing SAP own system tables (and probably mixing up the whole movement type determination...)
Hi,
not really a consigment specialist...
but "We want to perform a material to material posting with consignment stock. Nothing else." - does this make ANY sense?
I believe the error message says it all already:
"For ERP movement type 311, the following field cannot be changed: Product
Message No. /SCWM/ERPINTEGRATION110
Diagnosis
Due to your entry, the system found a movement type with which the goods movement is communicated to the ERP system.
However, this movement type only permits changes to specific fields.
Example: for a posting change product-to-product, you cannot simultaneously change the stock type.
Procedure
Reset the given field to its original value.
You might need to enter the posting change in two steps."
Now, you do not want 311, but 309 - have you tried that in ERP directly (with a non warehouse managed storage location)? Because that does not work for me either...
Brgds
Juergen
---
Want to learn EWM?
Check for EWM courses @ https://training.sap.com/curriculum/scm_ewm
Get a SAP Learning Hub Subscription: https://training.sap.com/shop/learninghub
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
A big chunk of our warehouse is occupied by consignment stock, and sometimes we need to change the product ID. (e.g. some of our POs are created manually and a clerk switches numbers when entering the MAT-IDs...).
Right now we are performing the steps you mention as a workaround:
But of course, the Business requests to save two out of three steps - and here we are with the requirement.
Your hint with posting in ERP is good, didn't think about it. So it looks as if we need to define a new customer specific movement type in ERP which allows the posting and map it to the posting string reference in EWM in /SCWM/TIMCBWA (IMG Transaction "Define Customer Specific Movement Types")...
Hello Martin,
What is your scenario ?
Because for posting consignment stock we use Item category.
Hence you can make use of consignment stock category with copy of 309 movement type.
BR,
Olet
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
As said above, the scenario is just a simple posting from one material (resp. product) number to another, but with consignment stock.
/SCWM/POST
Product: ABC ---> XYZ
Owner: MNO ---> MNO
Usage: C ---> C
The category for postings (doc.cat. = SPC) allows only item category DLV as far as I know. I would like to hear how this can be used in our case. As explained in my post, we couldn't connect 311 to 309 because of /SCWM/TIMBWAUFC.
User | Count |
---|---|
9 | |
4 | |
3 | |
3 | |
2 | |
2 | |
1 | |
1 | |
1 | |
1 |
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.