Message Split in GUI editor - please help

[Former Member]

Hi All!

I do have a requirement to map 1 XML file containing large amount of records into a SOAP service operation call that is bulk. The target Message will be more complicated in its hierarchy than the source message.

Thanks to the community members - I do have a message mapping that works well for 1:1 message mapping.

Here it is (also how the messages look like)

Now as I mentioned - the final solution should split target message into multiple occurrences of the same Message type.

Target mapping requirements:

- each source/Record element should create target/CardContract/BussContent element

- source/Record/newCardID should be mapped to target/CardContract/BussContent/CardID field

- after every 3 source/Record elements - another instance of mesage MT_CardCrtAsBulk should be created - typical bulk scenario with data packaging

I mean the following:

Record1 -> MT_CardCrtAsBulk1->BussConent1

Record2 -> MT_CardCrtAsBulk1->BussConent2

Record3 -> MT_CardCrtAsBulk1->BussConent3

Record4 -> MT_CardCrtAsBulk2->BussConent1

Record5 -> MT_CardCrtAsBulk2->BussConent2

Record6 -> MT_CardCrtAsBulk2->BussConent3

and so on...

I've tried to start with the splitting by myself - found some materials in SDN and so I changed the signature of the target message to 1..unbounded and did some draft work but I still cannot make it work.

That's what I did (simplified - constants assigned to CardID as I couldn't make it work otherwise):

Please note it's not working and I'm getting errors that depending on what I change in the flow - either CardID does not have value or CardContract

Could you guys please suggest the target mapping which would solve the requirements above?

Thank you all in advance!

Best regards

Greg

[former_member190293 · Accepted solution]

Hi Greg!

Try this:

Regards, Evgeniy.

[Former Member · Accepted solution]

Hi Evgeniy

It works! That's just brilliant! I guess you've done plethora of GUI mappings so far taking into account how fast you respond with a complete solution

Thanks again!

Best regards

Greg

[former_member190293 · Accepted solution]

Hi Greg!

Actually, idea came when I've read your message in previous thread. As you can see implementation isn't much complicated .

I'm glad that it helped.

Regards, Evgeniy.