on 06-29-2016 10:09 AM
Hello ,
Due to expand/collapse probelem in transaction ME21N , I want to create a flavor for each item container in Screen personas 2.0 ,
is that possible to have for each container a flavor?
Can i create for each container a flavor?
ses[0]/wnd[0]/usrUSRAREA/subcntSUB0SAPLMEGUI0013
ses[0]/wnd[0]/usrUSRAREA/subcntSUB0SAPLMEGUI0016
ses[0]/wnd[0]/usrUSRAREA/subcntSUB0SAPLMEGUI0019
Thanks
Flavors are always tied to a single transaction (and not to controls), so the answer is no.
Enjoy controls require quite careful handling because those embedded containers (and a lot of them in your case) can produce sometimes seemingly unpredictable results. This is not because of the Personas tool but due to the screen complexity.
In Personas 2.0, I found you have to be very careful about resizing or sometimes even moving the scrollable and collapsible containers because expand/collapse can be messed up very easily. Scrollbars appear when you don't expect them, controls are not moved up/down anymore upon expanding/collapsing etc.
How would a separate flavor for each container help you in achieving your goal?
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
Thanks for your reply Tamas, in fact i have a probelem with expand/collapse and SAP gave the solution below
"The recommended way to handle enjoy transactions in Personas is to
have 3 different flavors -
One for each container and switch between them in order to operate on
each collapsible container. "
So i was confused by the solution how can i create one flavor per container? , does it mean that each container have its own transaction
What was the context for that response and recommendation?
I have a hunch that this may refer to Personas 3.0 where such flavor switching is much easier, due to the significantly more capable scripting engine. I just don't see how would you do something like this in 2.0 since it lacks the necessary events to trigger such flavor switching.
I can see how this could work in 3.0 (albeit it would be somewhat awkward even then) but in 2.0 it is very doubtful that this can be accomplished.
User | Count |
---|---|
84 | |
23 | |
11 | |
9 | |
8 | |
5 | |
5 | |
5 | |
5 | |
4 |
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.