on 06-06-2016 4:23 PM
Hi Experts,
I need a suggestion.
We have very old logs in SM58.Can we clear those logs?
Can it affect DB consistency ?
Regards
N R
Hi,
May be an invalid comment, maybe also consider historic records i.e. is there a legal requirement in your country to keep any of this beyond a certain point?
Sometimes things like these just get missed and makes housekeeping more difficult and waste space as well.
Good luck.
J
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
Hello NR,
I agree with Amerjit.
Before deleting SM58 entries, you need to involve the functional team related to those.
SM58 entries store data that an application wanted to post to somewhere else (it could be the same SAP system, but usually is a different. remote system).
If you still see the entries at SM58, it means that data was not posted yet.
In addition, there is no way to recover entries that were deleted from SM58.
The application that originally created them would have to recreate them, if possible.
Thus, simply deleting the SM58 entries might cause data inconsistencies from a functional / business perspective.
Regards
Isaías
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
Hello NR,
If you have old entries in SM58. Check with the functional owners or the users involved.
More often than not you'll end up deleting the failed RFCs.
KR,
Amerjit
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
Hello Saurabh,
Having old RFCs sitting around doesn't effect the DB unless we're talking 100s of thousands as you will then most likely take a performance hit on the *RFC* tables.
If as you say the failed RFCs are *very* old, just for your own security, check with the users or functional owners involved.
The way I look at it, if they are seriously old then deleting probably wont be a problem as if they were critical someone would have complained or remarked by now.
As a guardian of the system I am generally loathe to delete data unless I get it confirmed as these things have a way of coming back and biting you later.
KR,
Amerjit
Hi Ranjan.
Refer the SAP Note - 375566 - Extremely large number of entries in tRFC and qRFC tables
BR
SS
User | Count |
---|---|
80 | |
9 | |
9 | |
7 | |
7 | |
6 | |
6 | |
6 | |
5 | |
4 |
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.