on 05-25-2016 5:04 PM
We need to be able to look back at RRB activity and identify when (dates) rejections were processed. .
I've looked at the standard RA WIP reports and the RRB Document Flow reports but they associate the rejection amounts with the initial cost posting period and not when they actually happened.
I have read Resource-related billing (RRB) - Product Lifecycle Management - SCN Wiki by Gerald Vilimovsky & Saurabh TiwariField which is very informative but doesn't nail down this particular issue explicitly.
I have looked at the RRB Document Flow tables; AD01DLI - Dynamic Items, AD01DLIEF - Individual Flow & AD01DLISF - Total Flow in the hope that I can find my way back up the audit trail of what happened when during any thread but that does not seem possible ... see my illustration below...
As far as I can see there is no way to pick apart the history of cost rejections.
Has anyone else had this requirement? Are there any tables or reports that I am unaware of? Does anybody out there have any idea how we might go about providing this information?
Any feedback much appreciated.
Regards.
Patrick.
Any thoughts anyone - no one else came across this requirement?
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
Thank you Mr Lakshmipathi but I am not clear how this is related to my problem. The note contains very little detail but seems to be about excluding items from subsequent RA periods. I want the opposite - I want to see rejected values appear on reports and associated with the actual date of the rejection.
Can you say a few more words to help me see how this might help please.
Regards.
Patrick.
In your illustration, you have mentioned that since there is no date in the table AD01DLI for DI number, and the said note says that after coding correction, it will read the document flow for each DLI to check the billing date, I thought of suggesting you to make an attempt. I am not sure on the outcome.
G. Lakshmipathi
User | Count |
---|---|
89 | |
7 | |
6 | |
3 | |
3 | |
3 | |
3 | |
3 | |
3 | |
3 |
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.