on 05-23-2016 9:27 PM
All,
I have built a new sandbox Enterprise Portal system and I am about to upgrade. Maintenance Planner is not picking up correct installed product instances. My old systems EP Dev, Qa and Prod systems have
Application Server Java
BI Java
Enterprise Portal
EP Core..
But the newly built SBX system is picking Application Server Java and BI Java automatically, and in Maintenance Plannner, under VERIFY it is giving 2 other installed instances to add Enterprise Portal and Developer Workplace. Why is this different for this system only? How do I correct? Is this correct and all other 3 systems wrong? How to add EP core? Please advise ASAP as I have to start upgrade ASAP, I had experience before if we did not choose proper installed instances in SMSY (usage type), some components will not be upgraded. I am afraid that might happen here as well. Please advise ASAP.
Below are installed components.
ADOBE DOCUMENT | 7.00 | 0027 | SP027 | ADOBE |
BI | 7.00 | 0027 | SP027 | BI |
BI | 7.00 | 0027 | SP027 | BI |
BI | 7.00 | 0027 | SP027 | BI |
BI | 7.00 | 0027 | SP027 | BI |
BI | 7.00 | 0027 | SP027 | UNIVERSAL DATA INTEGRATION 700 |
BI WEB | 7.00 | 0027 | SP027 | BI WEB |
BI | 7.00 | 0027 | SP027 | BI |
CAF | 7.00 | 0027 | SP027 | SAP |
DI | 7.00 | 0021 | SP021 | SAP |
EP | 7.00 | 0021 | SP021 | EP |
J2EE | 7.00 | 0027 | SP027 | BASETABLES |
J2EE | 7.00 | 0027 | SP027 | CORE |
JAVA | 7.00 | 0027 | SP027 | SAP |
JAVA | 7.00 | 0027 | SP027 | JAVA |
KMC | 7.00 | 0027 | SP027 | KMC |
KMC | 7.00 | 0027 | SP027 | KMC |
KMC | 7.00 | 0027 | SP027 | KMC |
LIFECYCLE MGMT PORTAL | 7.00 | 0027 | SP027 | LIFECYCLE MGMT PORTAL 7.00 |
LIFECYCLE MGMT TOOLS | 7.00 | 0027 | SP027 | LIFECYCLE MGMT TOOLS 7.00 |
PDK | 7.00 | 0027 | SP027 | PDK |
PORTAL | 7.00 | 0027 | SP027 | EPBC |
PORTAL | 7.00 | 0027 | SP027 | EPBC2 |
PORTAL | 7.00 | 0027 | SP027 | PORTAL |
PORTAL | 7.00 | 0027 | SP027 | PORTAL |
RTC | 7.00 | 0027 | SP027 | RTC |
RTC-STREAM | 7.00 | 0027 | SP027 | RTC-STREAM 7.00 |
SAP | 7.00 | 0027 | SP027 | SAP |
SAP | 7.00 | 0027 | SP027 | SAP |
SAP | 7.00 | 0027 | SP027 | SAP |
SAP | 7.00 | 0027 | SP027 | SAP |
SAP | 7.00 | 0027 | SP027 | SAP |
SAP | 7.00 | 0027 | SP027 | SAP |
SAP | 7.00 | 0027 | SP027 | SAP |
SAP | 7.00 | 0027 | SP027 | SAP |
UME | 7.00 | 0027 | SP027 | UME |
UWL | 7.00 | 0027 | SP027 | UWL |
VISUAL | 7.00 | 0027 | SP027 | VISUAL |
VISUAL | 7.00 | 0027 | SP027 | VISUAL |
VISUAL | 7.00 | 0027 | SP027 | VISUAL |
VISUAL | 7.00 | 0027 | SP027 | VISUAL |
VISUAL | 7.00 | 0027 | SP027 | VISUAL |
VISUAL | 7.00 | 0027 | SP027 | VISUAL |
WEB | 7.00 | 0027 | SP027 | WEB |
Also not sure about SAP CAF component question in below screen,
Other system have below usage types.
Thanks,
Kavitha Rajan.
HI Kavitha Rajan
please ensure that the info comes into LMDB automatically, if it states manual entry, I would suggest you to redefine the system in LMDB and push als data supplier job from the Java stack again.
if it came in automatically but maintenance planner takes wrong instance, check if the product instance assignment in LMDB is correct. If that is also the case, check for SAP notes with corrections, there are multiple recently released SAP notes for bug fixing.
kr
TOm
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
Tom,
Sorry for the late reply. In LMDB, I can see the data is AUTOMATIC and it has 4 product instances similar to what I have for dev, qa and prod. Only in maintenance Optimizer, the new sandbox system is giving issue with product instances. The system is in error and when I try to verify, there is no option to choose EP Core, but I have NW Developer workplace. We have components DI build tool and EP build tool which were not upgraded during the Support Stack upgrade as you see all the components above. May be this NW Developer Workplace is for those components? But then why other systems are not picking up this product instances. Thank you, I appreciate the guidance and pls help.
Thanks,
Kavitha Rajan.
User | Count |
---|---|
78 | |
10 | |
9 | |
7 | |
6 | |
6 | |
5 | |
5 | |
5 | |
4 |
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.