on 05-11-2016 9:03 PM
Hello everyone,
Looking for audit experiences related to the following situation:
I feel that the company needs to implement a non-prod SolMan system in order to carry out ChaRM development and testing, in order to be compliant with audits. Do you feel the same way? Have you encountered this audit issue specifically?
Any advice as to why or why not a non-prod SolMan is required would be much appreciated.
Landscapes includes ECC, BW, GRC, and ChaRM will manage transports throughout each landscape.
Thanks!
Ken
Hi Ken,
You can check my replies here
Do we need a landscape PRD QUAL DEV for Solutio... | SCN
further, have you already checked the master guide for solman 7.1 as below
https://websmp203.sap-ag.de/~sapidb/011000358700000288992011E/SM_MASTER_GUIDE_71SP13.pdf
kindly refer the section(5.1.1 Landscape Recommendation ) to know the pro/cons for each scenario
I hope this suffix your query.
Thanks
Prakhar
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
User | Count |
---|---|
71 | |
26 | |
10 | |
9 | |
7 | |
6 | |
4 | |
4 | |
4 | |
4 |
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.