on 04-27-2016 9:25 AM
Hello to all!
I implemented SSFS, created BRT$ADM user and fixed SDBAC_DATA.
system is using ssfs:
con_info_ext_support(): DBSL supports extended connect protocol
==> connect info for default DB will be read from ssfs
brconnect is ok:
su - oraew1
brconnect -u // -c -f check
BR0801I BRCONNECT 7.20 (42)
BR0805I Start of BRCONNECT processing: cetatcqm.chk 2016-04-27 11.16.12
BR0484I BRCONNECT log file: /oracle/EW1/sapcheck/cetatcqm.chk
BR0477I Oracle pfile /oracle/EW1/112_64/dbs/initEW1.ora created from spfile /oracle/EW1/112_64/dbs/spfileEW1.ora
BR0280I BRCONNECT time stamp: 2016-04-27 11.16.14
BR0813I Schema owners found in database EW1: APPQOSSYS, BRT$ADM, DBSNMP, DIP, ORACLE_OCM, OUTLN, SAPSR3*, SYS, SYSTEM
BR0280I BRCONNECT time stamp: 2016-04-27 11.16.23
BR0814I Number of tables/partitions in schema of owner SAPSR3: 38259/24
BR0836I Number of tables treated as info cubes for owner SAPSR3: 429
BR0814I Number of tables/partitions in schema of owner SYS: 918/138
BR0814I Number of tables/partitions in schema of owner SYSTEM: 157/45
BR0280I BRCONNECT time stamp: 2016-04-27 11.16.37
BR0815I Number of indexes/partitions in schema of owner SAPSR3: 48995/126
BR0815I Number of indexes/partitions in schema of owner SYS: 988/137
BR0815I Number of indexes/partitions in schema of owner SYSTEM: 224/64
but in db13 it seems like i did't make the changes in SDBAC_DATA:
backup job:
check db job:
What I forgot to do ? Thanks for help!
I fixed it. For my kernel I should use SDBAC table instead of SDBAC_DATA.
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
User | Count |
---|---|
79 | |
9 | |
9 | |
7 | |
7 | |
7 | |
6 | |
5 | |
5 | |
4 |
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.