cancel
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 

No errors but required output not obtained.

Former Member
0 Kudos

I have created a file to file scenario where all the objects in design and configuration are working fine. The file is being picked from the source and placed in the target directory. But the file which is received in the target directory does not have the desired out put. When I tried to execute the mapping in the design phase under the test tab, I am able to get the required output.

No error is thrown in MONI transaction and the message is in processed state. Is there any way to resolve this?

Accepted Solutions (0)

Answers (4)

Answers (4)

Former Member
0 Kudos

Hi Harini ,

Kindly check in RWB-Message Monitoring .. Here the clear content will be there with the payload status...

Former Member
0 Kudos

Hi Shaik,

I checked RWB-Mesaage monitoring.

My target payload structure doest not have any value in it. Just the below structure

<?XML version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>

<ns0:Z1_MT_ReceiverNme xmlns:ns0=**Namespace**/>

Here, Z1_MT_ReceiverNme is my receiver message type.

iaki_vila
Active Contributor
0 Kudos

Hi Harini,

You said:


"does not have the desired output"

What does it mean?, you don't have any tag, you have any value without this mapping correct, so on.

You can face up to the issue in different way, checking in the monitoring each case:

1. Do a file that raise an exception in mapping.

2. Change the values in different ways to check the scenario consistency.

3. Force your scenario to fail, for example set the receiver channel to inactive.

May be you have an older scenario runs, or you are overwriting the file with another scenario.

You should do a CPA cache refresh and try.

Regards

former_member182412
Active Contributor
0 Kudos

Hi Harini,

  • Did you select the operation mapping in interface determination or ICO?
  • Check cache is up to date.
  • If you select the right mapping and cache is up to date, check the payload after the mapping in message monitor and see is the same as what you get when you test the message mapping in repository?

Regards,

Praveen.

Former Member
0 Kudos

Hi Praveen,

Thanks for your suggestion..

I have defined the mapping in interface determination and my cache is up to date.

My inbound payload has the structure of my target structure..

Is there any way to change this?

former_member182412
Active Contributor
0 Kudos

Hi Harini,

If the payload after mapping matches the target structure then definitely problem with FCC if you have in receiver communication channel as already suggested by Raghu.

Regards,

Praveen.

former_member186851
Active Contributor
0 Kudos

Hello Harini,

Get the payload in MONI and test it in the message mapping.

Might be something not well formatted or some error in XML or FCC if you have any.

Former Member
0 Kudos

Hi Raghuraman,

Thanks for you input..

The payload of my inbound message has the structure of my target..

Yet there are no errors displayed in MONI and the message is executed successfully..

former_member186851
Active Contributor
0 Kudos

Then the final check could be in the receiver channel.

Check for any FCC or something in the file channel.

and let us know what exactly is the desired output.

Former Member
0 Kudos

Hi,

My sender CC is of type file content conversion and my receiver CC is File(NFS).

Guess my Content conversion parameters are working fine.

My scenario is splitting the name into first and last name.

My input name is a fixed string, so I used substrings for splitting the name.

When I tested the mapping under the test tab without pasting the payload from MONI I was able to get the required output(i,e) First name and last name.

But when I tested along with the payload I am getting the below structure in my target.

<?XML version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>

<ns0:Z1_MT_ReceiverNme

xmlns:ns0=**namespace**></ns0:Z1_MT_ReceiverNme>

Where Z1_MT_ReceiverNme is my receiver message type.

Guess my mapping is not getting executed.

Is there any way to resolve this??

former_member186851
Active Contributor
0 Kudos

Guess your source is not well formatted.

Check for red tags in the message mapping.